SóProvas


ID
136090
Banca
ESAF
Órgão
MPOG
Ano
2010
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Text 2
Source: The New York Times November 11, 2009 [slightly adapted]

Trucks, Trains and Trees
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

No matter how many times you hear them, there are some statistics that just bowl you over. The one that always stuns me is this: Imagine if you took all the cars, trucks, planes, trains and ships in the world and added up their exhaust every year. The amount of carbon dioxide, or CO2, all those cars, trucks, planes, trains and ships collectively emit into the atmosphere is actually less than the carbon emissions every year that result from the chopping down and clearing of tropical forests in places like Brazil, Indonesia and the Congo. We are now losing a tropical forest the size of New York State every year, and the carbon that releases into the atmosphere now accounts for roughly 17 percent of all global emissions contributing to climate change. [.]
"You need a new model of economic development - one that is based on raising people's standards of living by maintaining their natural capital, not just by converting that natural capital to ranching or industrial farming or logging," said José María Silva, a conservation expert. Right now people protecting the rainforest are paid a pittance - compared with those who strip it - even though we now know that the rainforest provides everything from keeping CO2 out of the atmosphere to maintaining the fl ow of freshwater into rivers.
The good news is that Brazil has put in place all the elements of a system to compensate its forest-dwellers for maintaining the forests. Brazil has already set aside 43 percent of the Amazon rainforest for conservation and for indigenous peoples. Another 19 percent of the Amazon, though, has already been deforested by farmers and ranchers.

The new model of economic development advocated in the text involves

Alternativas
Comentários
  • A) RIGHT - It is intended to reward people for they manteinance of their habitat and so enhancing their living standard.

    B) WRONG - Squander = oprimir

    C) WRONG - Wood extraction isn't mentioned in the text.

    D) WRONG - The text makes reference of punition to farmers, it is only said that the solution would be not only rewarding them, but also the inhabitants of the areas in study.

    E) WRONG - It is not the trees they must keep, but the area they live.

  • b) 
    raising people's living standards through squandering natural capital:
    “aumentando o padrão de vida das pessoas através de um gasto (excessivo) de capital natural”

    Na verdade, o texto fala em elevar o padrão de vida das pessoas, mantendo seu capital natural
    raising people's standards of living by maintaining their natural capital
  • Hello my friends, vamos ao que interessa que é acertar a questão, temos que ser objetivos e para isso não precisamos ler o texto todo, a não ser que ele peça a ideia central do texto, lógico! Mas caso ele queira apenas a ideia central de um parágrafo, podemos encontrar a resposta do seguinte modo:
    1. Identificamos a palavra-chave da questão "The new model of economic development advocated in the text involves:"
    2. Procuramos no texto a palavra-chave, que é obtida neste trecho "You need a new model of economic development - one that is based on raising people's standards of living by maintaining their natural capital, not just by converting that natural capital to ranching or industrial farming or logging," said José María Silva, a conservation expert."
    3. Lendo esse trecho (mesmo que você não tenha noção alguma do que algumas palavras querem dizer, nem eu mesma sei) temos que tentar extrair a ideia central, que é um novo modelo econômico baseado em alguma coisa positiva para as pessoas
    4. Então podemos verificar qual é a alternativa:
    D e E, ele fala em pagar (pay), nesse trecho não tem nada falando em pagar alguma coisa, então descartamos.
    B e C, você pode ter pensado "que diabo é squandering ?" e "ban on large-scale" dá pra ter uma noção que é alguma coisa em larga escala, mas o texto está falando isso? NÃO!!!, então descarta
    Logo a nossa alternativa correta é a letra A
    Espero ter ajudado
    Bons estudos
    =D
     

  • a-

    A pittance is paid to those who protect it while those exploiting it are rewarded more handsomely. The author proposes the opposite of this reality