SóProvas


ID
136093
Banca
ESAF
Órgão
MPOG
Ano
2010
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Text 2
Source: The New York Times November 11, 2009 [slightly adapted]

Trucks, Trains and Trees
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

No matter how many times you hear them, there are some statistics that just bowl you over. The one that always stuns me is this: Imagine if you took all the cars, trucks, planes, trains and ships in the world and added up their exhaust every year. The amount of carbon dioxide, or CO2, all those cars, trucks, planes, trains and ships collectively emit into the atmosphere is actually less than the carbon emissions every year that result from the chopping down and clearing of tropical forests in places like Brazil, Indonesia and the Congo. We are now losing a tropical forest the size of New York State every year, and the carbon that releases into the atmosphere now accounts for roughly 17 percent of all global emissions contributing to climate change. [.]
"You need a new model of economic development - one that is based on raising people's standards of living by maintaining their natural capital, not just by converting that natural capital to ranching or industrial farming or logging," said José María Silva, a conservation expert. Right now people protecting the rainforest are paid a pittance - compared with those who strip it - even though we now know that the rainforest provides everything from keeping CO2 out of the atmosphere to maintaining the fl ow of freshwater into rivers.
The good news is that Brazil has put in place all the elements of a system to compensate its forest-dwellers for maintaining the forests. Brazil has already set aside 43 percent of the Amazon rainforest for conservation and for indigenous peoples. Another 19 percent of the Amazon, though, has already been deforested by farmers and ranchers.

The writer 's view of Brazilian action shows

Alternativas
Comentários
  • A) WRONG - BECAUSE THE AUTHOR PRAISES THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT.

    B) RIGHT - BECAUSE THE AUTHOR INFERRES THE "GOOD NEWS" ABOUT THE NEW ENVORONMENTAL PROTECTION, BUT WHINES THE 19% OF ALREADY DESTRUCTED RAINFOREST.

    C) WRONG - BECAUSE THERE ARE NO UNQUALIFIES PRASES BY THE PART OF THE AUTHOR, WHAT IS GOING WELL IS JUST PRAISED AND WHAT WENT BAD IS JUST CRITICIZED

    D) WRONG - THE 43%, REFERS TO THE ALREADY RAINFOREST AND INDIGENOUS CONSERVATION.

    E) WRONG - THE 19%, REFERS TO THE ALREADY ERODED RAINFOREST.

  • Algumas questões não é preciso ler todo o texto para encontramos a resposta, como o tempo é curto temos que ser objetivos. Dando uma "olhadela" rapidamente verificamos que o trecho do texto que nos interessa é esse: "The good news is that Brazil has put in place all the elements of a system to compensate its forest-dwellers for maintaining the forests. Brazil has already set aside 43 percent of the Amazon rainforest for conservation and for indigenous peoples. Another 19 percent of the Amazon, though, has already been deforested by farmers and ranchers."
    Analisando cada item verificamos que:
    A e C estão erradas, pois o texto não está fazendo uma crítica ou desqualificando alguma atitude tomada pelo Brasil, muito pelo contrário, como está marcado em amarelo, ela é uma boa notícia.
    D e E estão erradas, porque a porcentagem é utilizada para mostrar quantos porcentos da floresta foi destinada à conservação e à população indígena; e quantos porcentos foi desmatado por agricultores e pecuaristas, não tem nada a ver se ele aprova ou desaprova.

    Espero ter ajudado
    Bons estudos
    =D