SóProvas


ID
2661964
Banca
FUMARC
Órgão
CEMIG - MG
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

READ THE FOLLOWING TEXT AND CHOOSE THE OPTION WHICH BEST COMPLETES EACH QUESTION ACCORDING TO IT:


                 Technology has created more jobs than it has destroyed


      The battle between men and machines goes back centuries. Are they taking our jobs? Or are they easing our workload? A study by economists at the consultancy Deloitte seeks to shed new light on the relationship between jobs and the rise of technology by searching through census data for England and Wales going back to 1871.

      Their conclusion is that, rather than destroying jobs, technology has been a “great job-creating machine”. Findings by Deloitte such as rise in bar staff since the 1950s or a surge in the number of hairdressers this century suggest to the authors that technology has increased spending power, therefore creating new demand and new jobs. Their study argues that the debate has been twisted towards the job-destroying effects of technological change, which are more easily observed than its creative aspects.

      Going back over past figures paints a more balanced picture, say authors Ian Stewart and Alex Cole. “The dominant trend is of contracting employment in agriculture and manufacturing being more than balanced by rapid growth in the caring, creative, technology and business services sectors,” they write. “Machines will take on more repetitive and laborious tasks, but they seem no closer to eliminating the need for human labor than at any time in the last 150 years.” 

      According to the study, hard, dangerous and dull jobs have declined. In some sectors, technology has quite clearly cost jobs, but they question whether they are really jobs we would want to hold on to. Technology directly substitutes human muscle power and, in so doing, raises productivity and shrinks employment. “In the UK the first sector to feel this effect on any scale was agriculture,” says the study. 

      The study also found out that ‘caring’ jobs have increased. The report cites a “profound shift”, with labor switching from its historic role, as a source of raw power, to the care, education and provision of services to others.

Technological progress has cut the prices of essentials, such as food, and the price of bigger household items such as TVs and kitchen appliances, notes Stewart. That leaves more money to spend on leisure, and creates new demand and new jobs, which may explain the big rise in bar staff, he adds. “_______ the decline in the traditional pub, census data shows that the number of people employed in bars rose fourfold between 1951 and 2011,” the report says.

      The Deloitte economists believe that rising incomes have allowed consumers to spend more on personal services, such as grooming. That in turn has driven employment of hairdressers. So, while in 1871 there was one hairdresser or barber for every 1,793 citizens of England and Wales; today there is one for every 287 people.

                                  (Adapted from: https://goo.gl/7V5vuw. Access: 02/02/2018.)

What has been changing in the role of labor because of technological progress?

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Gabarito C

     

    A dúvida aqui fica entre as alternativas C e D.

     

    A alternativa C afirma que deu mais ênfase em prover serviços às pessoas, o que está correto, uma vez que as máquinas estão fazendo mais trabalho "braçal" e liberando as pessoas para a área de serviços.

     

    A alternativa D afirma que se tornou uma fonte de força bruta. De fato as máquinas começaram a fazer a "força bruta", porém a questão pergunta de trabalho usando a palavra "Labor" que se refere ao trabalho humano tornando a alternativa incorreta.

  • (C)

    Their conclusion is that, rather than destroying jobs, technology has been a “great job-creating machine”. Findings by Deloitte such as rise in bar staff since the 1950s or a surge in the number of hairdressers this century suggest to the authors that technology has increased spending power, therefore creating new demand and new jobs. 

    Tradução-->A conclusão é que, em vez de destruir empregos, a tecnologia tem sido uma “grande máquina de criação de empregos”. Descobertas como aumento do quadro de funcionários dos bares desde a década de 1950 ou aumento do número de cabeleireiros neste século, sugerem aos autores que a tecnologia aumentou o poder de compra, criando, portanto, nova demanda e novos empregos.