Questão 3259999

• Banca: Colégio Pedro II
• Órgão: Colégio Pedro II
• Ano: 2019
• Provas: Colégio Pedro II - 2019 - Colégio Pedro II - Professor - Inglês
• Disciplina: Inglês
• Assuntos: Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

TEXT 2

“In spite of sharing Fairclough’s (1995/2010) view that the pedagogy of multiliteracies is situated in a critical language awareness perspective since its constructions parts from the problematization of work, citizenship and lifeworlds relations in the new global capitalism to propose the (re)design of meanings so as to account for the multiplicity of semiosis and lifestyles in contemporaneity, we can still notice that, in several aspects, the pedagogy designed by the New London Group legitimize some of the orders of discourse from this same capitalism it criticizes. Such a legitimation appears, for instance, in the comparison between teachers and managers used to define the notion of designer. It can also be noticed in the emphasis the Group places on the preparation for the labor market, even though the development of a metalanguage able to raise critical awareness about every practice is also emphasized. It is also worthwhile to highlight that the pedagogy of multiliteracies was thought as an educational alternative to respond to the “dramatic global economic change” we have been going through “as new business and management theories and practices emerge across the developed world” (NEW LONDON GROUP, 2000, p.10). Within this context, the fact of the multiliteracies pedagogy be constructed in the clash between legitimatizing and problematizing crystallized literacy practices from this developed world in the search of alternative life and educational designs becomes comprehensible.”

OLIVEIRA, M. B. F.; SZUNDI, P. T. C. Multiliteracies Practices at School: for a responsive education to contemporaneity.

Bakhtiniana, São Paulo, v. 9, n. 2, Jul./Dec. 2014, p. 202, 203.

According to the text, we may say that

• A. Despite criticizing capitalism, the New London Group ends up legitimatizing some of its orders of discourse.
• B. Due to the fact that they fail to problematize crystallized literacy practices, the New London group ends up legitimatizing the orders of discourse of capitalism.
• C. Although the New London Group shares Fairclough’s view on the pedagogy of multiliteracies, they fail to account for the multiplicity of semiosis and lifestyles in contemporaneity.
• D. Since the New London Group does not share Fairclough’s view on the pedagogy of multiliteracies, they construct a multiliteracies pedagogy which is capable of legitimatizing and problematizing crystallized literacy practices.

Gabarito: A

Comentários

• a-

  “In spite of sharing Fairclough’s (1995/2010) view that the pedagogy of multiliteracies is situated in a critical language awareness perspective since its constructions parts from the problematization of work, citizenship and lifeworlds relations in the new global capitalism to propose the (re)design of meanings so as to account for the multiplicity of semiosis and lifestyles in contemporaneity, we can still notice that, in several aspects, the pedagogy designed by the New London Group legitimize some of the orders of discourse from this same capitalism it criticizes.