SóProvas


ID
5562232
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
SEDUC-AL
Ano
2021
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

    The role of pronunciation in non-native language teaching has been in a state of constant change. In the earlier approaches, foreign language pronunciation was either the result of exposure to the target language or of approaches which used complex sets of drills and repetitions. As suggested, to a large extent, the importance of pronunciation has always been determined by ideology and intuition rather than by research. Teachers have intuitively decided which features have the greatest effect on clarity and which are learnable in a classroom setting. Saito claims that while the morphological and syntactical levels of languages are taught in contextualized meaningful exercises, pronunciation practice is decontextualized due to the use of drills and repetition.
    Pronunciation is one of the aspects of language both native and non-native teachers of English are not keen on teaching, and a lack of adequate teacher training results in an intuitive use of available materials and techniques. Setting pedagogical goals must be based on knowledge of pronunciation issues. Unqualified teachers may have misconceptions about phonological phenomena, cannot evaluate or use teaching materials accurately, and do not set realistic goals when teaching pronunciation. Furthermore, even teaching materials do not reflect the conclusions of current research, and they can be perceived as boring; however, Baker argues that teachers who complete a pronunciation course have, and apply, a wider range of pronunciation activities in their classrooms.

H. Vančová. Current Issues in Pronunciation Teaching to Non-Native Learners of English.
In: Journal of Language and Cultural Education, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 2019 (adapted).

Based on the text above, judge the following item.


In “Unqualified teachers may have misconceptions about phonological phenomena” (second paragraph), the word “may” could be correctly replaced with might.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • may/might is "poderia".

  • Questão CERTA, might pode ser substituído por may. As diferenças de uso são sutis.

  • Tanto MIGHT quanto MAY possuem o sentido de probabilidade e de permissão. Porém a principal diferença entre eles é o tempo verbal, já que um é passado do outro.

     

    MAY é uma probabilidade que poderá acontecer num futuro e passa mais certeza na frase. Já o MIGHT é passado de MAY e, justamente por isso, passa menos certeza.

     

    It may rain this weekend.

    It might rain this weekend.

    http://yes.com.br/might-x-may-diferenca/

  • Eu errei pois achei que might mudaria o tempo verbal para o passado

  • Já não é a primeira vez que vejo questão Cespe alterando o tempo verbal e o gabarito informando como "certo".

    Será que alguém poderia explicar? Alguma dica?

  • muda o tempo verbal e está certo? aí arrebenta nois

  • galera, também errei por achar que mudaria o sentido, já que o tempo verbal muda.

    mas a questão Q1854074 traz no comando:

    "The verbal phrase “quit making” could be correctly replaced with quit to make, without changing the meaning of the text."

    Espero que isso seja o padrão do cespe: cobrar mudança de sentido e especificar isso no comando da questão.