Questão 1539262

• Banca: CAIP-IMES
• Órgão: Consórcio Intermunicipal Grande ABC
• Ano: 2015
• Provas: CAIP-IMES - 2015 - Consórcio Intermunicipal Grande ABC - Gestor de Políticas Públicas Regionais
• Disciplina: Inglês
• Assuntos: Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

                                                                                                                Clues to How an Electric Treatment for Parkinson’s Work

In 1998, Dr. Philip A. Starr started putting electrodes in people’s brains. A neurosurgeon at the University of California, San Francisco, Dr. Starr was treating people with Parkinson’s disease, which slowly destroys essential bits of brain tissue, robbing people of control of their bodies. At first, drugs had given his patients some relief, but now they needed more help. After the surgery, Dr. Starr closed up his patients’ skulls and switched on the electrodes, releasing a steady buzz of electric pulses in their brains. For many patients, the effect was immediate. “We have people who, when they’re not taking their meds, can be frozen,” said Dr. Starr. “When we turn on the stimulator, they start walking.” First developed in the early 1990s, deep brain stimulation, or D.B.S., was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating Parkinson’s disease in 2002. Since its invention, about 100,000 people have received implants. While D.B.S. doesn’t halt Parkinson’s, it can turn back the clock a few years for many patients. Yet despite its clear effectiveness, scientists like Dr. Starr have struggled to understand what D.B.S. actually does to the brain. “We do D.B.S. because it works,” said Dr. Starr, “but we don’t really know how.” In a recent experiment, Dr. Starr and his colleagues believe they found a clue. D.B.S. may counter Parkinson’s disease by liberating the brain from a devastating electrical lock-step.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/16/science/ (adapted)

The future form of: “We do D.B.S. because it works, but we don’t really know how.” is:

• A. We will do D.B.S. because it will work, but we won’t really know how.
• B. We will do D.B.S. because it works, but we can’t really know how.
• C. We would do D.B.S. because it would work, but we would really know how.
• D. We would do D.B.S. because it works, but we don’t really know how.

Gabarito: A

Comentários

• Alternativa A.

  Para passar para a forma negativa, coloca-se "will" antes do verbo. Nas formas negativas, coloca-se antes do verbo "won't".

  We will do D.B.S. because it will work, but we won’t really know how.

   

• Corrigindo a Mônica TRT, WILL é para passar para o futuro e não para o negativo, acho que ela se confundiu.

• Exatamente o meu entendimento.

• Acredito que nesse momento, há aquela velha previsão de que as sanções administrativas, penais e civeis são diferentes e independentes.

  Ou seja,

  Administrativamente: Será exonerado.

  Penalmente: Era agente público quando cometeu o tipificado no artigo 323, CP.

  Civilmente: Trazendo prejuízo, cabe indenização.

• "Julgue os itens a seguir, relativos aos crimes contra a administração pública".

  Esse é o Enunciado do das questões da prova, logo, a questão deverá ser respondida conforme a luz do Direito Penal - Crimes contra a adm, e não conforme a Lei 8.112/1990.

  https://arquivos.qconcursos.com/prova/arquivo_prova/187/cespe-2005-trt-16-regiao-ma-analista-judiciario-area-judiciaria-execucao-de-mandados-prova.pdf?_ga=2.190689515.1190228393.1628472902-930640518.1628472902

  Questão n° 115.