SóProvas


ID
1786
Banca
NCE-UFRJ
Órgão
BNDES
Ano
2005
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

READ TEXT I AND ANSWER QUESTIONS 21 TO 25:

TEXT I

The integral approach strategies adopted by
Favela-Bairro consist of proposals of integrated and
participative actions. The path that goes from welfare
to work should combine programs and services for
human and social development with labor and incomegeneration
opportunities. To be viable, however, social
promotion interventions should be focused on
geographical areas with a high concentration of poverty,
specifically on the poorest families.
An intersectoral decentralized and participative
approach can produce synergetic effects capable of
providing greater impact for poverty and inequality
reduction policies, and capable of contributing to their
sustainability.
Although Favela-Bairro has been based on the idea
of integrated urban infrastructure interventions, initially
the program did not incorporate all the basic components
of an integral approach strategy. These components
were gradually incorporated into its design as a result
of the participatory process and the transformations
that occurred in the municipal administration.
Favela-Bairro is the result of an evolving process
that resulted in the creation of a typical integral
development model with a territorial base that
incorporates life-cycle perspectives.
Rio de Janeiro inhabitants, either living in favelas
or not, recognize the importance of the Favela-Bairro
program. A public opinion poll carried out in 2003 asked
cariocas (as Rio residents are called) to choose from
a list of governmental programs the one to which the
next mayor should give priority. Favela-Bairro was
chosen in first place in all three rounds of the survey.
The same institute asked respondents about the most
important project for the city, and again Favela-Bairro
ranked first: 26.1 percent of respondents have elected
Favela-Bairro as more important than programs such
as minimum income, popular restaurants, and even
essential works in major city roads.

(www.worldbank.org on September 10, 2005)

should in "to which the next mayor should give priority" (l. 30/31) expresses a(n):

Alternativas
Comentários
  • We use SHOULD to give advice or recommendation; CAN expresses ability, possibility, permission, it depends on the context. MUSTN'T represents a prohibition : you mustn't do it, so don't do it. Finally, MUST and HAVE TO INDICATE AN OBLIGATION.
  • Nós usamos "should"para expressar opinião, dar conselhos e sugestões ou fazer recomendações."Should"é menos intenso do que "must"ou "have to"."É frequentemente usado com "I think". Ex: I think they should keep the contract. I don't think they should replace him. Do you think we should tell her?Podemos também dar conselhos usando o "had better"Entretanto quando usamos o "had better" para dar um conselho e este não for seguido, há a possibilidade de uma consequência ruim.Ex: You'd better do what I say or else you will get into trouble. I'd better get back to work or my boss will be angry with me. We'd better get to the airport by five or else we may miss the flight.