SóProvas

ID
447640
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
SERPRO
Ano
2008
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

          One frequently overlooked area in planning is technical reviews and inspections. A technical review requires substantial preparation on the part of the presenters. Documents must be published and distributed and presentation material organized and made into slides or overheads. Practice sessions are conducted by presenters with an audience of critics to prepare for the review.
              The reviewers should read the material, attend the presentations, and write reports. On large projects with many reviews and walk-throughs involving many participants, a substantial number of labor hours can be consumed analyzing documents, attending meetings, and writing reports. For example, a system design review for one module or unit can require 150 labor hours. When overlooked, this labor can result in a very large error in resource and schedule estimation.
          Many projects include risk assessment and risk management as a key part of the planning process and expect the plan to identify specific risk areas. The plan is expected to quantify both probability of failure and consequences of failure and to describe what will be done to contain development risk.
                                 A. Behforooz and F. Hudson. Software engineering fundamentals. Ed. Oxford (adapted).

Based on the text above, judge the following items.

At the beginning of the second paragraph, “should” can be correctly replaced by ought to.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • correct per the answer sheet, but it's highly debatable. Should goes with  passages with a hint of suggestion, bordering on subjective clues given by the speaker and as a way of pointing out the way something should be done, while "ought to" indicates that there's a stark compelling motive for the interlocutor to perform the action encased within the ought to clause. As far as the context in this passage is concerned, this assertive should be called out.

    gabarito correto- o cespe pegou a definição literal do www.dictionary.com ("should" e "ought to" significam dever, mas "ought to" é no sentido de obrigação incondicional) e viu que para definir should se usou "ought to" or "must" no sentido de "ter que fazer". O problema é que contextualmente está errado, já que ,consoante a estrutura semântica da passagem, o autor está dando uma sugestão aos "reviewers", ao invés de estar ditando regra a eles.
  • correct per the answer sheet, but it's highly debatable. Should goes with  passages with a hint of suggestion, bordering on subjective clues given by the speaker and as a way of pointing out the way something should be done, while "ought to" indicates that there's a stark compelling motive for the interlocutor to perform the action encased within the ought to clause. As far as the context in this passage is concerned, this assertive should be called out.

    gabarito correto e pegadinha mal colada do cespe, que pegou a definição literal do www.dictionary.com ("should" e "ought to" significam dever, mas "ought to" é no sentido de obrigação incondicional) e viu que para definir should se usou "ought to" or "must" no sentido de "ter que fazer". O problema é que contextualmente está errado, já que ,consoante a estrutura semântica da passagem, o autor está dando uma sugestão aos "reviewers", ao invés de estar ditando regra a eles.
  • correct per the answer sheet, but it's highly debatable. Should goes with  passages with a hint of suggestion, bordering on subjective clues given by the speaker and as a way of pointing out the way something should be done, while "ought to" indicates that there's a stark compelling motive for the interlocutor to perform the action encased within the ought to clause. As far as the context in this passage is concerned, this assertive should be called out.

    gabarito correto- o cespe pegou a definição literal do www.dictionary.com ("should" e "ought to" significam dever, mas "ought to" é no sentido de obrigação incondicional) e viu que para definir should se usou "ought to" or "must" no sentido de "ter que fazer". O problema é que contextualmente está errado, já que ,consoante a estrutura semântica da passagem, o autor está dando uma sugestão aos "reviewers", ao invés de estar ditando regra a eles.