SóProvas



Questões de Futuro perfeito | Future perfect


ID
2856418
Banca
COSEAC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Maricá - RJ
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

TEXT 1 below, retrieved and adapted from https://chroniclingamerica. loc.gov/lccn/sn83035487/1851-06-21/ed-1/seq-4/ on July 9th, 2018.


Text 1 


                    Women’s rights convention – Sojourner Truth


      One of the most unique and interesting speeches of the convention was made by Sojourner Truth, an emancipated slave. It is impossible to transfer it to paper or convey any adequate idea of the effect it produced upon the audience. Those only can appreciate it who saw her powerful form, her whole-souled, earnest gesture, and listened to her strong and truthful tones. She came forward to the platform and addressing the President said with great simplicity:

      "May I say a few words?" Receiving an affirmative answer, she proceeded: I want to say a few words about this matter. I am a woman's rights. I have as much muscle as any man and can do as much work as any man. I have plowed and reaped and husked and chopped and mowed, and can any man do more than that? I have heard much about the sexes being equal. I can carry as much as any man, and can eat as much too, if I can get it. I am as strong as any man that is now. As for intellect, all I can say is, if a woman has a pint, and a man a quart -- why can't she have her little pint full? You need not be afraid to give us our rights for fear we will take too much; -- for we can't take more than our pint will hold. The poor men seem to be all in confusion, and don't know what to do. Why children, if you have woman's rights, give it to her and you will feel better. You will have your own rights, and they won't be so much trouble. I can't read, but I can hear. I have heard the bible and have learned that Eve caused man to sin. Well, if a woman upset the world, do give her a chance to set it right side up again. The Lady has spoken about Jesus, how he never spurned woman from him, and she was right. When Lazarus died, Mary and Martha came to him with faith and love and besought him to raise their brother. And Jesus wept and Lazarus came forth. And how came Jesus into the world? Through God who created him and the woman who bore him. Man, where was your part? But the women are coming up blessed be God and a few of the men are coming up with them. But man is in a tight place, the poor slave is on him, woman is coming on him, he is surely between a hawk and a buzzard.


Reference: Robinson, M. (1851, June 21). Women’s rights convention: Sojourner Truth. Anti-slavery Bugle, vol. 6 no. 41, Page 160.

Question must be answered by looking at the following sentence from Text 1:


I have plowed and reaped and husked and chopped and mowed, and can any man do more than that?


We may say that the verbs Sojourner uses are:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • SIMPLE PRESENT , PRESENT CONTINUOUS, PRESENT PERFECT, PERFECT CONTINUOUS

    I PLOW , I 'M PLOWING, I HAVE PLOWED, I HAVE PLOWING

  • SIMPLE PRESENT , PRESENT CONTINUOUS, PRESENT PERFECT, PERFECT CONTINUOUS

    I PLOW , I 'M PLOWING, I HAVE PLOWED, I HAVE PLOWING R:E

    Gostei (

    0

    )


ID
3839710
Banca
UECE-CEV
Órgão
UECE
Ano
2013
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

TEXT

     BRASÍLIA — Brazil’s highest court has long viewed itself as a bastion of manners and formality. Justices call one another “Your Excellency,” dress in billowing robes and wrap each utterance in grandiloquence, as if little had changed from the era when marquises and dukes held sway from their vast plantations.
     In one televised feud, Mr. Barbosa questioned another justice about whether he would even be on the court had he not been appointed by his cousin, a former president impeached in 1992. With another justice, Mr. Barbosa rebuked him over what the chief justice considered his condescending tone, telling him he was not his “capanga,” a term describing a hired thug. 
      In one of his most scathing comments, Mr. Barbosa, the high court’s first and only black justice, took on the entire legal system of Brazil — where it is still remarkably rare for politicians to ever spend time in prison, even after being convicted of crimes — contending that the mentality of judges was “conservative, pro-status-quo and pro-impunity.”
     “I have a temperament that doesn’t adapt well to politics,” Mr. Barbosa, 58, said in a recent interview in his quarters here in the Supreme Federal Tribunal, a modernist landmark designed by the architect Oscar Niemeyer. “It’s because I speak my mind so much.” 
     His acknowledged lack of tact notwithstanding, he is the driving force behind a series of socially liberal and establishment-shaking rulings, turning Brazil’s highest court — and him in particular — into a newfound political power and the subject of popular fascination. 
   The court’s recent rulings include a unanimous decision upholding the University of Brasília’s admissions policies aimed at increasing the number of black and indigenous students, opening the way for one of the Western Hemisphere’s most sweeping affirmative action laws for higher education. 
     In another move, Mr. Barbosa used his sway as chief justice and president of the panel overseeing Brazil’s judiciary to effectively legalize same-sex marriage across the country. And in an anticorruption crusade, he is overseeing the precedent-setting trial of senior political figures in the governing Workers Party for their roles in a vast vote-buying scheme.
   Ascending to Brazil’s high court, much less pushing the institution to assert its independence, long seemed out of reach for Mr. Barbosa, the eldest of eight children raised in Paracatu, an impoverished city in Minas Gerais State, where his father worked as a bricklayer.  
    But his prominence — not just on the court, but in the streets as well — is so well established that masks with his face were sold for Carnival, amateur musicians have composed songs about his handling of the corruption trial and posted them on YouTube, and demonstrators during the huge street protests that shook the nation this year told pollsters that Mr. Barbosa was one of their top choices for president in next year’s elections.
     While the protests have subsided since their height in June, the political tumult they set off persists. The race for president, once considered a shoo-in for the incumbent, Dilma Rousseff, is now up in the air, with Mr. Barbosa — who is now so much in the public eye that gossip columnists are following his romance with a woman in her 20s — repeatedly saying he will not run. “I’m not a candidate for anything,” he says. 
     But the same public glare that has turned him into a celebrity has singed him as well. While he has won widespread admiration for his guidance of the high court, Mr. Barbosa, like almost every other prominent political figure in Brazil, has recently come under scrutiny. And for someone accustomed to criticizing the so-called supersalaries awarded to some members of Brazil’s legal system, the revelations have put Mr. Barbosa on the defensive. 
     One report in the Brazilian news media described how he received about $180,000 in payments for untaken leaves of absence during his 19 years as a public prosecutor. (Such payments are common in some areas of Brazil’s large public bureaucracy.) Another noted that he bought an apartment in Miami through a limited liability company, suggesting an effort to pay less taxes on the property. In statements, Mr. Barbosa contends that he has done nothing wrong. 
     In a country where a majority of people now define themselves as black or of mixed race — but where blacks remain remarkably rare in the highest echelons of political institutions and corporations — Mr. Barbosa’s trajectory and abrupt manner have elicited both widespread admiration and a fair amount of resistance. 
     As a teenager, Mr. Barbosa moved to the capital, Brasília, finding work as a janitor in a courtroom. Against the odds, he got into the University of Brasília, the only black student in its law program at the time. Wanting to see the world, he later won admission into Brazil’s diplomatic service, which promptly sent him to Helsinki, the Finnish capital on the shore of the Baltic Sea. 
     Sensing that he would not advance much in the diplomatic service, which he has called “one of the most discriminatory institutions of Brazil,” Mr. Barbosa opted for a career as a prosecutor. He alternated between legal investigations in Brazil and studies abroad, gaining fluency in English, French and German, and earning a doctorate in law at Pantheon-Assas University in Paris. 
   Fascinated by the legal systems of other countries, Mr. Barbosa wrote a book on affirmative action in the United States. He still voices his admiration for figures like Thurgood Marshall, the first black Supreme Court justice in the United States, and William J. Brennan Jr., who for years embodied the court’s liberal vision, clearly drawing inspiration from them as he pushed Brazil’s high court toward socially liberal rulings.
    Still, no decision has thrust Mr. Barbosa into Brazil’s public imagination as much as his handling of the trial of political operatives, legislators and bankers found guilty in a labyrinthine corruption scandal called the mensalão, or big monthly allowance, after the regular payments made to lawmakers in exchange for their votes. 
    Last November, at Mr. Barbosa’s urging, the high court sentenced some of the most powerful figures in the governing Workers Party to years in prison for their crimes in the scheme, including bribery and unlawful conspiracy, jolting a political system in which impunity for politicians has been the norm.  
     Now the mensalão trial is entering what could be its final phases, and Mr. Barbosa has at times been visibly exasperated that defendants who have already been found guilty and sentenced have managed to avoid hard jail time. He has clashed with other justices over their consideration of a rare legal procedure in which appeals over close votes at the high court are examined. 
     Losing his patience with one prominent justice, Ricardo Lewandowski, who tried to absolve some defendants of certain crimes, Mr. Barbosa publicly accused him this month of “chicanery” by using legalese to prop up certain positions. An outcry ensued among some who could not stomach Mr. Barbosa’s talking to a fellow justice like that. “Who does Justice Joaquim Barbosa think he is?” asked Ricardo Noblat, a columnist for the newspaper O Globo, questioning whether Mr. Barbosa was qualified to preside over the court. “What powers does he think he has just because he’s sitting in the chair of the chief justice of the Supreme Federal Tribunal?” 
      Mr. Barbosa did not apologize. In the interview, he said some tension was necessary for the court to function properly. “It was always like this,” he said, contending that arguments are now just easier to see because the court’s proceedings are televised. 
     Linking the court’s work to the recent wave of protests, he explained that he strongly disagreed with the violence of some demonstrators, but he also said he believed that the street movements were “a sign of democracy’s exuberance.” 
     “People don’t want to passively stand by and observe these arrangements of the elite, which were always the Brazilian tradition,” he said. 

In the sentence “A political system in which impunity in politics has been the norm,” the verb phrase in the future perfect tense becomes

Alternativas

ID
4895983
Banca
CONSESP
Órgão
Prefeitura de Santa Fé do Sul - SP
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Point the sentence that doesn't indicate Future.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • A) She's going to ou She is going to = Indicam futuro. O going to é traduzido como ''vai fazer algo''. Ex: I am going to study English. (Eu vou estudar Inglês).

    B) It'll take... Esse ''It'll significa futuro.O apostrofo ' ll é uma abreviação de IT WILL. Nesse caso é como se fosse: Isto irá ou levará 5 minutos para terminar.

    C) He's loving New York- A frase está no Present Continuous também conhecido por Present Progressive. Se comparando ao Português é algo como o nosso gerúndio. Nesse caso em questão: Ele está amando Nova York.

    D) Mesma situação da letra C. (Ela está mudando na próxima semana).

  • A questão pede a que não indica tempo futuro


ID
5027374
Banca
OMNI
Órgão
Prefeitura de Iraceminha - SC
Ano
2021
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Which verb tense the sentence below refer to?


"Has he been driving everyday?"

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Present Perfect Continuous

    Has -> flexão do verbo have para He/She/It no presente

    Perfect -> uso do verbo Have

    Continous -> flexão do verbo com -ING

  • O presente perfeito contínuo (Present perfect continuous), também conhecido como presente perfeito progressivo, mostra que algo começou no passado e continua no presente. Ele é formado usando a construção have/has been +  (verb + -ing). Ex: I have been living in Miami for 3 years. (Moro em Miami há 3 anos.)
    Para formar a interrogativa, colocamos have / has antes do sujeito e adicionamos a forma been + verb + -ing : Has he been driving everydayEle tem dirigido todos os dias?

    Gabarito do Professor: Letra B.



ID
5030029
Banca
AMEOSC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Guarujá do Sul - SC
Ano
2021
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Assinale a alternativa que contém uma frase que faz referência a um evento no futuro.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • I'm coming back NEXT Monday.

    A expressão "NEXT", no contexto inserido, fornece a ideia de que no futuro próximo, o sujeito voltará. Não necessariamente há um indicador de futuro quanto ao tempo verbal, porém há a junção de sentidos do NEXT + I'm coming.

    D

    EsPCEx 2022

  • A questão cobra conhecimento gramatical, especificamente sobre o tempo futuro.

    A questão nos pede para assinalar a alternativa que contém uma frase que faz referência a um evento no futuro. 


    Analisando as alternativas teremos:


    A) Incorreto - She has been studying since last week.  = Ela está estudando desde a semana passada.
    A ação se refere a algo que vem acontecendo, não faz referência a um evento no futuro. 

    B) Incorreto - I missed school yesterday.  = Eu perdi a escola ontem.
    A ação se refere a algo que aconteceu, não faz referência a um evento no futuro. 

    C) Incorreto - All the people are leaving the room.  = Todas as pessoas estão saindo da sala.
    A ação se refere a algo que está acontecendo no momento, não faz referência a um evento no futuro.

    D) Correto - I'm coming back next Monday.  = Volto na próxima segunda-feira.
    A ação se refere ao futuro, à próxima segunda-feira.


    Gabarito do Professor: Letra D.


ID
5370307
Banca
IMPARH
Órgão
Prefeitura de Fortaleza - CE
Ano
2021
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

“We ________ every stores empty if they ________ early.”

The alternative that contains the correct answer to the sentence above is:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • would have found – had arrived.


ID
5409157
Banca
UECE-CEV
Órgão
UECE
Ano
2021
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

The World Might Be Running Low on Americans


    The world has been stricken by scarcity. Our post-pandemic pantry has run bare of gasoline, lumber, microchips, chicken wings, ketchup packets, cat food, used cars and Chickfil-A sauce. Like the Great Toilet Paper Scare of 2020, though, many of these shortages are the consequence of near-term, Covid-related disruptions. Soon enough there will again be a chicken wing in every pot and more than enough condiments to go with it.


    But there is one recently announced potential shortage that should give Americans great reason for concern. It is a shortfall that the nation has rarely had to face, and nobody quite knows how things will work when we begin to run out.


    I speak, of course, of all of us: The world may be running low on Americans — most crucially, tomorrow’s working-age, childbearing, idea-generating, community-building young Americans. Late last month, the Census Bureau released the first results from its 2020 count, and the numbers confirmed what demographers have been warning of for years: The United States is undergoing “demographic stagnation,” transitioning from a relatively fast-growing country of young people to a slow-growing, older nation.


    Many Americans might consider slow growth a blessing. Your city could already be packed to the gills, the roads clogged with traffic and housing prices shooting through the roof. Why do we need more folks? And, anyway, aren’t we supposed to be conserving resources on a planet whose climate is changing? Yet demographic stagnation could bring its own high costs, among them a steady reduction in dynamism, productivity and a slowdown in national and individual prosperity, even a diminishment of global power.


    And there is no real reason we have to endure such a transition, not even an environmental one. Even if your own city is packed like tinned fish, the U.S. overall can accommodate millions more people. Most of the counties in the U.S. are losing working-age adults; if these declines persist, local economies will falter, tax bases will dry up, and local governments will struggle to maintain services. Growth is not just an option but a necessity — it’s not just that we can afford to have more people, it may be that we can’t afford not to.


    But how does a country get more people? There are two ways: Make them, and invite them in. Increasing the first is relatively difficult — birthrates are declining across the world, and while family-friendly policies may be beneficial for many reasons, they seem to do little to get people to have more babies. On the second method, though, the United States enjoys a significant advantage — people around the globe have long been clamoring to live here, notwithstanding our government’s recent hostility to foreigners. This fact presents a relatively simple policy solution to a vexing long-term issue: America needs more people, and the world has people to send us. All we have to do is let more of them in.


    For decades, the United States has enjoyed a significant economic advantage over other industrialized nations — our population was growing faster, which suggested a more youthful and more prosperous future. But in the last decade, American fertility has gone down. At the same time, there has been a slowdown in immigration.


    The Census Bureau’s latest numbers show that these trends are catching up with us. As of April 1, it reports that there were 331,449,281 residents in the United States, an increase of just 7.4 percent since 2010 — the second-smallest decade-long growth rate ever recorded, only slightly ahead of the 7.3 percent growth during the Depression-struck 1930s.


    The bureau projects that sometime next decade — that is, in the 2030s — Americans over 65 will outnumber Americans younger than 18 for the first time in our history. The nation will cross the 400-million population mark sometime in the late 2050s, but by then we’ll be quite long in the tooth — about half of Americans will be over 45, and one fifth will be older than 85.


    The idea that more people will lead to greater prosperity may sound counterintuitive — wouldn’t more people just consume more of our scarce resources? Human history generally refutes this simple intuition. Because more people usually make for more workers, more companies, and most fundamentally, more new ideas for pushing humanity forward, economic studies suggest that population growth is often an important catalyst of economic growth.


    A declining global population might be beneficial in some ways; fewer people would most likely mean less carbon emission, for example — though less than you might think, since leading climate models already assume slowing population growth over the coming century. And a declining population could be catastrophic in other ways. In a recent paper, Chad Jones, an economist at Stanford, argues that a global population decline could reduce the fundamental innovativeness of humankind. The theory is simple: Without enough people, the font of new ideas dries up, Jones argues; without new ideas, progress could be imperiled.


    There are more direct ways that slow growth can hurt us. As a country’s population grows heavy with retiring older people and light with working younger people, you get a problem of too many eaters and too few cooks. Programs for seniors like Social Security and Medicare may suffer as they become dependent on ever-fewer working taxpayers for funding. Another problem is the lack of people to do all the work. For instance, experts predict a major shortage of health care workers, especially home care workers, who will be needed to help the aging nation.


    In a recent report, Ali Noorani, the chief executive of the National Immigration Forum, an immigration-advocacy group, and a co-author, Danilo Zak, say that increasing legal immigration by slightly more than a third each year would keep America’s ratio of working young people to retired old people stable over the next four decades. 


    As an immigrant myself, I have to confess I find much of the demographic argument in favor of greater immigration quite a bit too anodyne. Immigrants bring a lot more to the United States than simply working-age bodies for toiling in pursuit of greater economic growth. I also believe that the United States’ founding idea of universal equality will never be fully realized until we recognize that people outside our borders are as worthy of our ideals as those here through an accident of birth.

In the sentence “The bureau projects that sometime next decade — that is, in the 2030s — Americans over 65 will outnumber Americans younger than 18 for the first time in our history.” the verb tenses are, respectively,

Alternativas

ID
5561206
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2021
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos


ICE AGE

    Ice Age is an animated movie about a story that took place 20,000 thousand years ago. At that time, (I) everything was covered in ice. The movie follows the path of a mammoth, a sabertooth tiger and a sloth after they encounter an Eskimo baby and decide to protect it from the cold and other animals.
    (II) Diego, the tiger, had attacked the tribe to get the baby eskimo but was not successful. Other tigers were unhappy with Diego because of his incompetence to get the baby, who is now with Manfred, the mammoth, and Sid, the sloth. Eventually the three animals get together, although with very different agendas, and form a friendship bond while taking care of the human baby.
    The movie also features a squirrel desperately trying to bury an acorn without success. This squirrel has such a distinctive personality that we can only hope (III) he’ll star in his own movie someday.

The sentences that are underlined in the text are in the:  

Alternativas
Comentários
  • oq mata a questão é descobrir se "covered" é verbo ou adjetivo, e na questão ela é adjetivo, estando assim no simple past como o verbo to be como verbo principal.


ID
5600872
Banca
Avança SP
Órgão
Prefeitura de Louveira - SP
Ano
2022
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Observe a estrutura verbal a seguir:


• Sujeito + simple future do verbo to have (will have) + o particípio do verbo principal.


A estrutura verbal apresentada acima é a representação de qual tempo verbal? 

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Os particípios, assim como os gerúndio e infinitivo, são formas nominais dos verbos, que não são conjugadas com os sujeitos e que indicam uma ação já finalizada. Alguns exemplos dessa classe são: cantado, estudado, comido, dito, feito, escrito.

    Na estrutura verbal em questão, podemos adicionar o particípios "been" para facilitar a compreensão. Assim ficaria: "will have been" ("terá sido") ou seja, a união do "simple future" com o particípio indicando ação finalizada (perfect) e não um "continuous" ou apenas um "simple" como afirmam as demais alternativas.

    Seguem o enunciado e as alternativas traduzidos:

    "Observe a estrutura verbal a seguir:

    Sujeito + simple future do verbo to have (will have) + o particípio do verbo principal

    A estrutura verbal apresentada acima é a representação de qual tempo verbal?

    a) incorreta, "futuro"

    b) incorreta, "futuro contínuo"

    c) incorreta, "futuro simples"

    d) correta, "futuro perfeito"

    e) incorreta, "futuro perfeito contínuo"

    Gabarito: D


ID
5631943
Banca
IBFC
Órgão
SEED - RR
Ano
2021
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Read the sentences below and see if the tense indication is correct.


I. Other man will climb these stairs and sit at my desk. – future simple

II. I’ll propably take – future perfect

III. By the end of next month he will have been here for ten Years – future perfect

IV. I will be helping Mary tomorrow. – future simple

Estão corretas as afirmativas:

Alternativas