A questão cobra conhecimento gramatical, especificamente
sobre verbos regulares e irregulares.
Vamos analisar o enunciado:
After reading the extract, choose the best option:
Tradução -Depois de ler o trecho, escolha a melhor opção:
Embora a questão não necessite do texto para ser resolvida, vou traduzi-lo apenas para seu conhecimento!
“The current approach is bust," said Prof Des
Thompson, principal science adviser at NatureScot,
Scotland's conservation agency, which contributed
to the declaration process run by the Scottish
government. “What we need to do is work with
local communities, local governments and local
communities – that's how we're going to meet
those targets."
Tradução - “A abordagem atual é uma falha", disse o professor Des Thompson, principal consultor científico da NatureScot, agência de conservação da Escócia, que contribuiu para o processo de declaração conduzido pelo governo escocês. “O que precisamos fazer é trabalhar com as comunidades locais e governos locais - é assim que vamos cumprir essas metas."
A questão cobra conhecimento sobre o passado simples de verbos regulares e irregulares.
Em Inglês existem verbos regulares, cujo passado simples termina em "ed" e verbos irregulares, cujo passado simples não segue um padrão. Veja exemplos:
Analisando as alternativas teremos:
A)
Incorreto - Both “said" and “contributed" are irregular verbs
= Tanto "disse" quanto "contribuiu" são verbos irregulares.
"Said" é irregular, pois não termina em "ed" e "contributed" é regular.
B)
Incorreto - Both “said" and “contributed" are regular verbs
= Tanto "disse" quanto "contribuiu" são verbos regulares.
"Said" é irregular, pois não termina em "ed" e "contributed" é regular.
C)
Incorreto -
“said" is a regular verb and “contributed" is an
irregular verb = “disse" é um verbo regular e “contribuiu" é um verbo irregular.
"Said" é irregular, pois não termina em "ed" e "contributed" é regular.
D)
Correto - “said" is an irregular verb and “contributed" is an
regular verb
= “disse" é um verbo irregular e “contribuiu" é um verbo regular.
E)
Incorreto - None of them are verbs
= Nenhum deles é um verbo.
Ambos são verbos.
Gabarito do Professor: Alternativa D.d-
Irregular verbs can be split into 4 distinct types:
1- Verbs with the same base form, past simple and past participle: e.g.: put, let, cost, set, cut
2- Verbs with the same past simple and past participle - e.g.: bring-brought,brought. buy- bought, bought
3- same base form and past participle- come- came, come
4- Verbs with a different base form, past simple and past participle - speak, spoke, spoken; sink, sank, sunk.
https://www.wallstreetenglish.com/blog/regular-and-irregular-english-verbs/
Seals on the Isle of Skye in Scotland.
The worldwide effort to combat critical levels of biodiversity loss will fail without far greater involvement from local communities, according to an international declaration.
The “Edinburgh declaration”, published on Monday, urges leaders to work more closely with sub-national governments, indigenous peoples, national parks, local councils and wider society in meeting 20 biodiversity goals set out in the Aichi accord, signed in Nagoya, Japan, 10 years ago.
Those targets were due to have been met by 2020. None of them were, leaving global biodiversity in a parlous state, the statement says.
“The current approach is bust,” said Prof Des Thompson, principal science adviser at NatureScot, Scotland’s conservation agency, which contributed to the declaration process run by the Scottish government. “What we need to do is work with local communities, local governments and local communities – that’s how we’re going to meet those targets.”
Published by the Scottish government after a series of online conferences, the declaration has been signed by a core group of local politicians and conservation bodies from Scotland, Wales, Quebec, Germany, Sweden, the Basque country in Spain, and Japan.
The document was drafted for the latest round of talks on the Convention of Biological Diversity, which had been due to take place this autumn in China but was postponed because of the coronavirus pandemic. It has been rescheduled for next year.
The Aichi biodiversity goals for 2020 included removing all incentives or subsidies harmful to nature; halving the rate of loss of all habitats, including forests; managing all fish stocks and aquatic plants sustainably; cutting pollution, including from farming, to sustainable levels; preventing extinctions; and properly funding all the conservation projects needed to meet the 20 goals.
The Edinburgh declaration, which will now be opened to signatories worldwide, says its supporters are “deeply concerned about the significant implications that the loss of biodiversity and climate change has on our livelihood and communities. The impacts on our environment, infrastructure, economy, health and wellbeing, and our enjoyment of nature are already visible. Indeed, the Covid-19 global pandemic has reminded us how important it is to live in harmony with nature.”
The convention on biological diversity was first opened for signature at the Earth summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. Successive multilateral global conferences have made modest progress in upholding the convention’s objectives.
Thompson said Scotland was set to meet nine of the Aichi goals.
These are chiefly focused on scientific, policy-making and political capacity, but the UK is not yet meeting the targets around adequate funding on biodiversity or phasing out harmful subsidies and biodiversity loss.