SóProvas



Questões de Pronome relativo | Relative clauses


ID
27337
Banca
FCC
Órgão
TRE-SE
Ano
2007
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Atenção: Para responder às questões de números 53 a 60,
considere o texto abaixo.

Brian Krebs on Computer Security


Three of the most aggressive buyers of online advertising
space today agreed to
...53... fines and reform their advertising
practices as part of a landmark anti-spyware settlement.

Mobile phone giant Cingular Wireless LLC, and travel
sites Priceline.com and Travelocity.com agreed to settle their
part in an ongoing investigation by the New York State Attorney
General's office, which last year sued adware/spyware purveyor
DirectRevenue for deceptively and fraudulently installing its popup
ad serving and Web tracking software on millions of PCs
...54... approval or consent of consumers.

This is an important settlement on a number of levels.
Online help forums are awash in desperate messages from
consumers
...55... machines were besieged by pop-up ads after
visiting a Web site that used slimy drive-by tactics to install
DirectRevenue's software, which is notoriously difficult to
remove from a host machine.

Perhaps more significantly, these advertisers were just
as culpable for supporting DirectRevenue's sleazy business
practices long after anti-spyware activists like Ben Edelman,
Suzi Turner and others published evidence of the illegal
distribution methods of DirectRevenue and the Webmasters it
paid to install its software. Experts consistently documented
adware bundles like the ones distributed by DirectRevenue
being installed on computers that contract distributors had
already infected with computer viruses and worms.

Ari Schwartz, deputy director for the Center for
Democracy & Technology, a consumer policy group in
Washington, D.C., said today's settlement was important
because it recognizes the oft-overlooked role that advertisers
continue to play in supporting the adware and spyware industry.

"The dirty secret about unwanted adware is that many
legitimate companies 
- knowingly or not - fund its proliferation
with their advertising dollars. Until we cut off that funding, there
will always be a financial incentive for companies to bombard
users with adware that they neither want nor need," Schwartz
said in a written statement.

While the settlement is a welcome and important one, the
terms and fines could have been a bit stiffer. Under the terms of
the agreement, all three companies will have to pay between
$30,000 and $35,000 each to New York state. In addition, "prior
to contracting with a company to deliver their ads, and quarterly
thereafter, the companies must investigate how their online ads
are delivered. The companies must immediately cease using
adware programs that violate the settlement agreements or their
own adware policies."

By Brian Krebs ? January 29, 2007
(Adapted from:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/01/web_advertisers
_settle_ny_spyw.html)

Atenção: Para responder às questões de números 53 a 60,
considere o texto abaixo.

Brian Krebs on Computer Security
Three of the most aggressive buyers of online advertising
space today agreed to
...Q9108... fines and reform their advertising
practices as part of a landmark anti-spyware settlement.
Mobile phone giant Cingular Wireless LLC, and travel
sites Priceline.com and Travelocity.com agreed to settle their
part in an ongoing investigation by the New York State Attorney
General's office, which last year sued adware/spyware purveyor
DirectRevenue for deceptively and fraudulently installing its popup
ad serving and Web tracking software on millions of PCs
...Q9109... approval or consent of consumers.
This is an important settlement on a number of levels.
Online help forums are awash in desperate messages from
consumers
...Q9110... machines were besieged by pop-up ads after
visiting a Web site that used slimy drive-by tactics to install
DirectRevenue's software, which is notoriously difficult to
remove from a host machine.
Perhaps more significantly, these advertisers were just
as culpable for supporting DirectRevenue's sleazy business
practices long after anti-spyware activists like Ben Edelman,
Suzi Turner and others published evidence of the illegal
distribution methods of DirectRevenue and the Webmasters it
paid to install its software. Experts consistently documented
adware bundles like the ones distributed by DirectRevenue
being installed on computers that contract distributors had
already infected with computer viruses and worms.
Ari Schwartz, deputy director for the Center for
Democracy & Technology, a consumer policy group in
Washington, D.C., said today's settlement was important
because it recognizes the oft-overlooked role that advertisers
continue to play in supporting the adware and spyware industry.
"The dirty secret about unwanted adware is that many
legitimate companies 
- knowingly or not - fund its proliferation
with their advertising dollars. Until we cut off that funding, there
will always be a financial incentive for companies to bombard
users with adware that they neither want nor need," Schwartz
said in a written statement.
While the settlement is a welcome and important one, the
terms and fines could have been a bit stiffer. Under the terms of
the agreement, all three companies will have to pay between
$30,000 and $35,000 each to New York state. In addition, "prior
to contracting with a company to deliver their ads, and quarterly
thereafter, the companies must investigate how their online ads
are delivered. The companies must immediately cease using
adware programs that violate the settlement agreements or their
own adware policies."

By Brian Krebs ? January 29, 2007
(Adapted from:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2007/01/web_advertisers
_settle_ny_spyw.html)

Alternativas
Comentários

  • b) whose
    preenche corretamente o espaço marcado com ...55...
  • whose seria o nosso famoso CUJO(A)
  • b-

    Online help forums are awash in desperate messages from consumers whose machines were besieged by pop-up ads after visiting a Web site that used slimy drive-by tactics to install DirectRevenue's software, which is notoriously difficult to remove from a host machine.

     

    The spying malaware was deployed to users' machines without their knowledge, the upshot of which was distress on their part for having their computers hijacked by an unknown software application. 


ID
199780
Banca
FCC
Órgão
BAHIAGÁS
Ano
2010
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Brazil is one of the world's fastest growing economies
with enormous energy requirements. The growing consumer
base coupled with rapid industrial development has infused the
overall energy demand and encouraged natural gas
consumption in the country. The volatile international crude oil
prices as well as the cheaper and environment-friendly nature of
natural gas have further boosted the use of natural gas
throughout the country. This has resulted in enormous demand
for gas flow measurement and supervision devices in the
country which is all set to uplift the sales and deployment of gas
meters.

According to our latest research report "Brazil Gas Meter
Market Forecast to 2013", Brazil gas meter industry is being
increasingly benefitted by surging piped natural gas
consumption in the residential, commercial, industrial and
automobile sectors. The natural gas distribution network
reached around 18,400 Km in 2009. In order to strictly supervise
the gas flow measurement and to accurately measure its
quantity, the utilities are rapidly deploying gas meter devices in
their transportation network. These utilities are not only installing
conventional gas meters, but also rapidly opting advanced
metering devices such as AMR and AMI to ensure accurate and
immediate information on gas consumption. This adoption has
enabled utilities to automate their gas distribution networks and
upgrade safety standards in their routine operations.


No texto acima, o pronome relativo which, no 1º parágrafo, refere-se a

Alternativas
Comentários
  • This has resulted in enormous demand for gas flow measurement and supervision devices in the country which is all set to uplift the sales and deployment of gas meters.


    Isso resultou em enorme demanda para medição de vazão de gás e dispositivos de supervisão no país que está tudo pronto para elevar as vendas e implantação de medidores de gás.

  • Which IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS ... se tivesse se referindo a algo no plural, o verbo não seria o IS..


ID
259186
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
MMA
Ano
2011
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

1 As the evidence and knowledge of the physical effects of climate change continue to grow, the world is starting to dissect how those physical changes (e.g. water scarcity, sea-
4 level rise, increased temperatures), both current and predicted, will intersect with society and economies and the potentially significant environmental and human impacts that will result.
7 Of emerging interest are the potential impacts of climate change on the enjoyment of human rights and wellbeing. Weather and environmental degradation have, as one of
10 multiple stressors, threatened lives and livelihoods throughout history, but what makes this interaction more relevant today is the growing evidence that greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions
13 have contributed and will continue to contribute to long-term or permanent changes to our ecosystems and landscapes and will increase the frequency and severity of extreme events. This
16 amplifies existing social risks and vulnerabilities and will therefore increase the pressures faced by many disadvantaged individuals and populations in Canada and abroad.
19 On January 15 2009, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) released a study on climate change and human rights in response to UN
22 Resolution 7/23 in which signatories expressed concern “that climate change poses an immediate and far-reaching threat to people and communities around the world and has implications
25 for the full enjoyment of human rights.” Internet: (adapted)

In the line 22, the pronoun “which" refers to “signatories".

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Errado,
    "wich" refere-se a "study on climate change and human rights".
  • Concordo com o gabarito, mas estou com uma dúvida em relação ao comentário da colega acima:
     which refere-se:
    - ao Estudo em mudanças climáticas e direitos humanos (study on climate change and human rigths)
    ou
    - à Resolução 7/23 da ONU (UN Resolution 7/23) ???
     Como na sequência são mencionados os signatários (signatories) e, pelo que eu saiba, estudo não tem signatário - só resolução - fiquei com essa dúvida.
     Se alguém souber e for postar, por favor, deixe um aviso também em minha página de recados.
    Obrigada
  • "in which" refere-se à resolução
    which atua como pronome relativo e retoma o antecedente. espero ter ajudado!
  • R: “which” refers to “UN Resolution 7/23”.
    "(...) em resposta à Resolução 7/3 NA QUAL os signatários expressaram (...)" basta traduzir para o portguês que fica bem claro.
  • On January 15 2009, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) released a study on climate change and human rights in response to UN Resolution 7/23 in which signatories (of UN Resolution 7/23) expressed ...


    Em 15 de janeiro de 2009, o Alto Comissariado das Nações Unidas para os Direitos Humanos (ACNUDH) divulgou um estudo sobre a mudança climática e os direitos humanos em resposta à resolução da ONU 7/23, na qual os signatários (da resolução da ONU 7/23) expressaram ....


ID
259201
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
MMA
Ano
2011
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

1 Climate change is a defining issue of our time, a challenge that already affects and will increasingly impact all nations, including some whose very survival is at risk. The
4 complexity of the problem is intrinsically linked with overarching societal issues, such as poverty reduction, economic development and population growth
7 After a decade of work on integrating Earth- and satellite-based observing networks, thereby establishing new observation methods that have made a tremendous impact on
10 the way climate change and physical oceanic variability is measured, scientists are once again exploring uncharted waters and looking to set a new course for the future at the
13 OceanObs'09 Conference in Venice, Italy on September 21-25. Ten years ago — at the first conference for a comprehensive ocean observing system — scientists envisioned measuring
16 satellite altimetry of sea-surface height with tide gauges and buoy measurements in order to forecast ocean currents. They brainstormed methods for monitoring changes in temperature
19 and salinity in the Southern Ocean and the South Atlantic which had never been systematically monitored. They also drew up a plan for implementing a global array of temperature
22 and salinity floats that would profile the water column down to a depth of 2,000 meters in real time. The initiatives launched at that conference a decade ago have since provided data that
25 fed the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments of human influence on climate change, improved seasonal forecasts crucial for agriculture, hydropower, and
28 storm prediction and provided information invaluable to the lives and safety of mariners. Internet: (adapted).

Scientists are once again exploring waters which have not yet been explored.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Assertiva CORRETA. "Scientists are once again exploring waters which have not yet been explored." TRADUÇÃO: Os cientistas estão novamente explorando águas que não tinham sido exploradas ainda.

    No texto temos: [...] which had never been systematically monitored (linha 20) TRADUÇÃO: [...] que nunca tinha sido sistematicamente monitoradas.

    Ou seja, item CERTO
  • Discordo desse gabarito, para mim o item está ERRADO. 

    11 ".. scientists are once again exploring uncharted waters" : Acontece que a expressão "uncharted waters" tem duplo sentido, e está sendo usada como metáfora, no sentido mais geral de "terreno desconhecido", "abordagem inédita". Não é que as águas oceânicas em questão nunca tenham sido exploradas, é a metodologia que os cientistas estão usando que é nova! 

    A assertiva não tem cabimento, pois toma a expressão "uncharted waters" no sentido literal, de "águas não mapeadas/não exploradas" no sentido físico. 

    OBS: As linhas 18 a 20 apenas se referem a métodos para monitorar a temperatura e salinidade das águas. Aliás, monitorar é muito diferente de explorar!

    (Para divulgar a Campanha Nota Justa, veja instruções em http://www.questoesdeconcursos.com.br/topicos/810-campanha-nota-justa-nos-comentarios-do-qc)
  • Concordo com o Ricardo, "uncharted waters" é uma expressão, não significa que os cientistas estão literalmente explorando ou descobrindo áreas ou águas desconhecidas. 
  • Concordo com o Davi e com o Ricardo. 
    Até porque não é possível explorar DE NOVO o que NUNCA foi explorado antes. 
  • "(...) scientists are once again exploring uncharted waters (...)"


ID
263236
Banca
COPEVE-UFAL
Órgão
UFAL
Ano
2011
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos


'CityVille' now bigger on Facebook than 'FarmVille'
(Mashable) -- Facebook game developer Zynga has proved once
again that it knows exactly what it needs to do to keep millions of
Facebook users happy and occupied.
In less than a month, its latest game "CityVille"___ ______
(become) the most popular application on Facebook, surpassing
Zynga's previous hit "FarmVille" in all areas.
According to AppData, "CityVille" now has 16.8 million daily
active users, compared to "FarmVille's" 16.4 million. Looking at
monthly active users, "CityVille" is also ahead with 61.7 million
users, while "FarmVille" trails behind with 56.8 million users.
Zynga's "FrontierVille" and "Texas HoldEm Poker" also round out
the top five: put those four apps together (we'll disregard the fact
that many of those users overlap for a second) and you have a
very impressive number: 184 million active users across four
games.
The only non-Zynga app in the top five list is "Phrases," _____ at
one point threatened to take the top place, but is now
overshadowed by both "CityVille" and "FarmVille."
"CityVille's" future success wasn't hard to predict after an
amazingly good start at the beginning of December, but it's still
impressive to see Zynga amassing tens of millions of users in a
matter of days, proving that all that venture capital that went into
the company isn't there by accident.
Fonte :cnn.com

Complete the sentence from the text with a pronoun: “The only non-Zynga app in the top five list is "Phrases,"_____ at one point threatened to take the top place,…”

Alternativas
Comentários
  • who - refere-se à pessoa -> liga duas ideias com o mesmo sujeito
    where - refere-se a lugar
    whose - cujo(a)
    whom - refere-se à pessoa -> liga duas ideias quando o sujeito de uma é o objeto da outra.
    which - refere-se à coisa -> liga duas ideias com o mesmo sujeito ou quando o sujeito de uma delas é objeto da outra.

    Na questão, which refere-se à "Phrases"->coisa
    Letra E

  • e-

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    A relative pronoun connects a modifying clause or phrase to a noun or pronoun.

    The most common relative pronouns are who, whom, whose, which, and that. When and where can, at times, be used as relative pronouns as well.

    Relative pronouns are placed directly after the noun or pronoun they modify. For example:

       The driver who ran the stop sign was careless.

       The children, whom we love dearly, need better educations.

       Never go to a medical physician whose office plants have died.

       I have a friend whose cat is annoying.

       The book, which is now out of print, has all the information you need.

       This is the book that everyone is talking about.

    Which is used in non-defining clauses to add information that isn't essential to the sentence's overall meaning. They could be left out whilst keeping the same information. The relative pronouns used for this situation are who, whom & which (the latter which is reserved for non-human entities)

    - This lectern, which has often been used for this sort of mass service, is due to be renovated in a fortnight

    - The docent, whom we hold in high esteem, gave the prosecutor the right information.


ID
463906
Banca
CESGRANRIO
Órgão
Transpetro
Ano
2011
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Model copes with chaos to deliver relief Computer program helps responders transport supplies in tough conditions
By Rachel Ehrenberg Science News, Web edition: Monday, February 21st, 2011
WASHINGTON — Getting blood or other perishable supplies to an area that’s been struck by an earthquake or hurricane isn’t as simple as asking what brown can do for you. But a new model quickly determines the best routes and means for delivering humanitarian aid, even in situations where bridges are out or airport tarmacs are clogged with planes.
The research, presented February 18 at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, could help get supplies to areas which have experienced natural disasters or help prepare for efficient distribution of vaccines when the flu hits.
Efficient supply chains have long been a goal of manufacturers, but transport in fragile networks — where supply, demand and delivery routes may be in extremely rapid flux — requires a different approach, said Anna Nagurney of the University of Massachusetts Amherst, who presented the new work. Rather than considering the shortest path from one place to another to maximize profit, her system aims for the cleanest path at minimum cost, while capturing factors such as the perishability of the product and the uncertainty of supply routes. ‘You don’t know where demand is, so it’s tricky,’ said Nagurney. ‘It’s a multicriteria decision-making problem.’
By calculating the total cost associated with each link in a network, accounting for congestion and incorporating penalties for time and products that are lost, the computer model calculates the best supply chain in situations where standard routes may be disrupted.
‘Mathematical tools are essential to develop formal means to predict, and to respond to, such critical perturbations,’ said Iain Couzin of Princeton University, who uses similar computational tools to study collective animal behavior. ‘This is particularly important where response must be rapid and effective, such as during disaster scenarios … or during epidemics or breaches of national security.
’ The work can be applied to immediate, pressing situations, such as getting blood, food or medication to a disaster site, or to longer-term problems such as determining the best locations for manufacturing flu vaccines. . Retrieved April 7th, 2011.

In terms of pronominal reference,

Alternativas
Comentários
  • ... transport in fragile networks - where supply, demand and ....
    ... transporte em redes frágeis, onde (redes nas quais) oferta, demanda e ...
  • a) “…that…" (line 2) refers to area
    b) “…which…" (line 11) refers to areas (line 10).

    c) “where…" (line 16) refers to “…networks" (line 15).
    but transport in fragile networks — where supply, demand and delivery routes may be in extremely rapid flux — requires a different approach

    d) “…where…" (line 31) refers to demands
    e) “This…" (line 37) refers to Mathematical tools being essential to develop formal means to predict


ID
574681
Banca
Marinha
Órgão
ESCOLA NAVAL
Ano
2009
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Which of the alternatives below completes the sentence correctly?

The private military company Blackwater has offered its ship as an escort,________ (1) includes armed security, small boats and air platforms, but to date it hasn't had any customers in the region.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • WHICH - para COISAS 
    WHO - para PESSOAS 
    THAT - para AMBAS 

    WHICH vs THAT 
    WHICH é usado para introduzir uma "nonessential clause", ou seja, sem a informação a frase continua a fazer sentido.
    Ex: I won first prize, which was a bicycle!

    THAT é usado para introduzir uma "essential clause", ou seja, uma informação que é vital para o entendimento e compreensão da frase. 
    Ex: I do not remenber the day, that my dog was born

  • Se a oração está separada por vírgulas (O.S.A.Restritiva) podemos substituir who, whom ou which por that.


ID
791065
Banca
ACAPLAM
Órgão
Prefeitura de Aroeiras - PB
Ano
2010
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Indique as alternativas que preenchem corretamente as
lacunas.

The Titanic was going very fast, _____ was dangerous.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • e) which

    The Titanic was going very fast, which was dangerous.
    O Titanic estava indo muito rápido, o que era perigoso.

ID
876661
Banca
FEPESE
Órgão
CASAN
Ano
2011
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Can I help reduce energy consumption?


We have an important role to play right now. Energy conservation helps a lot in preserving our planet’s rich natural resources and promoting a healthy environment. Here you will find simple things that you can do to help reduce energy consumption.



·         Turn–off non-essential lights and appliances. The electricity generated by fossil fuels for a single home puts more carbon dioxide into the air than two average cars.


·         Avoid turning on large appliances such as washers, dryers, and electric ovens during peak energy hours: from 5:00 am to 9:00 am and 4: pm to 7:00 pm.


·         Install white window curtains to reflect heat away from the house. Close them at night to reduce the amount of heat lost through windows. People who live in countries that have warm climates should do this during the day as well.


·         Turn off the lights in any room you are not using and consider installing timers, photo cells, or occupancy sensors to reduce the amount of time your lights are on.

Na frase “People who live in countries that have warm climates…” a palavra destacada está sendo usada como:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Relative pronoun

  • Gabarito (A)

    Relative pronouns (pronome relativo) SEMPRE se refere ao que vem antes.

     → “People who live in countries that have warm climates…”

     → "Pessoas que vivem em países com climas quentes..."

    Bons estudos!

  • Relative pronoun.

    WHO: Apenas para referenciar pessoas.

    WHO= que

    #Seguimos Tentando


ID
891886
Banca
IBFC
Órgão
INEP
Ano
2012
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Read the text and answer questions 19), 20), 21), 22), 23) and 24).

Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes

For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers. The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake. The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation. Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works. “Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year. While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoe... 

Read the following passages:
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a little- known dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.

The underlined bold words are

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Gab.: A

    Relative Pronouns....Tradução

    Who..........................quem, que, o qual

    Whom.......................quem

    Whose.......................cujo, cuja, cujos, cujas

    Which........................que, o qual, o que

    Where.......................onde, em que, no que, no qual, na qual, nos quais, nas quais

    When.........................quando, em que, no qual, na qual, nos quais, nas quais

    That...........................que

    What.........................o que

     

    Alguns pronomes são utilizados para pessoas, coisas ou ambos. Por exemplo, o who e o whom são utilizados para pessoas e o which é para coisas. Já para pessoas e coisas utilizamos o that.

    Note que o pronome whose é utilizado para indicar posse. E isso vale tanto para pessoas como coisas.

    O pronome where faz referência a lugares, o when ao tempo e o what a algo que é sujeito ou objeto da frase.

    Importante destacar que os pronomes relativos são também utilizados como pronomes interrogativos. No entanto, nesse caso, eles são usados em perguntas (question words).


ID
1089853
Banca
VUNESP
Órgão
CODESP-SP
Ano
2011
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

     The ability of a helicopter to hover and land almost anywhere makes it an enormously useful machine. But helicopters have their limitations, particularly when it comes to flying fast. In a recent series of test flights, a new type of chopper has begun smashing speed records.

     The x2 is an experimental helicopter being developed by Sikorsky, an American company, which hopes it will be zipping along at more than 460kph. The company, however, is interested in more than just breaking speed records. It plans to use the technology developed for the x2 in commercial helicopters.

     Sikorsky reckons that future helicopters built using the x2 technology would be extremely versatile machines. They would dash to and from a medical emergency a lot faster. They would also be very agile in flight, which would increase their capabilities in combat.

(Adapted from The Economist September 11, 2010, page 98)

No segundo parágrafo do texto, which refere-se a

Alternativas

ID
1256425
Banca
IDECAN
Órgão
AGU
Ano
2014
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

                                  This (Illegal) American Life

By Maria E. Andreu

      My parents came to New York City to make their fortune when I was a baby. Irresponsible and dreamy and in their early 20s, they didn't think things through when their visa expired; they decided to stay just a bit longer to build up a nest egg.
      But our stay got progressively longer, until, when I was 6, my grandfather died in South America. My father decided my mother and I should go to the funeral and, with assurances that he would handle everything, sat me down and told me I'd have a nice visit in his boyhood home in Argentina, then be back in America in a month.
      I didn't see him for two years.
      We couldn't get a visa to return. My father sent us money from New Jersey, as the months of our absence stretched into years. Finally, he met someone who knew "coyotes" - people who smuggled others into the U.S. via Mexico. He paid them what they asked for, and we flew to Mexico City.
      They drove us to the Mexican side of the border, and left us at a beach. Another from their operation picked us up there and drove us across as his family. We passed Disneyland on our way to the airport, where we boarded the plane to finally rejoin my father.
      As a child, I had thought coming back home would be the magical end to our troubles, but in many ways it was the beginning. I chafed at the strictures of undocumented life: no social security number meant no public school (instead I attended a Catholic school my parents could scarcely afford); no driver's license, no after-school job. My parents had made their choices, and I had to live with those, seeing off my classmates as they left on a class trip to Canada, or packing to go off to college, where 1 could not go.
      The year before I graduated from high school, Congress passed the amnesty law of 1987. A few months after my 18th birthday, I became legal and what had always seemed a blank future of no hope suddenly turned dazzling with possibility.
      When I went for my interview at the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the caseworker looked at me quizzically when he heard me talk in unaccented English and joke about current events. Surely this American teenager did not fit in with the crowd of illegals looking to make things right.
      At the time, I was flattered. His confusion meant I could pass as an American.

                                  (Newsweek, October 2f 2008. Page 12.)


In "Finally, he met someone who knew 'coyotes' - people who smuggled others into the United States via Mexico." the relative pronouns can

Alternativas
Comentários
  • http://mundoeducacao.bol.uol.com.br/ingles/relative-pronouns.htm

  • LETRA A

    38 In “Finally, he met someone who knew ‘coyotes’ – people who smuggled others into the United States via Mexico.” the relative pronouns can

    38 Em "Finalmente, ele encontrou alguém que conhecia os 'coiotes' - pessoas que contrabandeavam outros para os Estados Unidos via México" os pronomes relativos podem

    A) be replaced by that. = ser substituídos por "que"

    In “Finally, he met someone who/that knew ‘coyotes’ – people who/that smuggled others into the United States via Mexico.”

    Who = quem, que >>> pronome relativo para se referir a pessoas

    That = que = pronome relativo que pode se referir tanto a pessoas como a coisas Ao se referir a pessoas tanto faz usar o who como o that no meio da frase. Esta é a opção correta.

    B) refer back to things. = se referir a coisas passadas

    O pronome relativo se remete à pessoa anterior, não a coisas passadas. Opção errada.

    C) be replaced by those.= ser substituídos por aqueles

    O those é plural e portanto não pode se referir a someone que é singular. Errada.

    D) be replaced by which.= ser substituídos por que

    Which = que, qual >> como pronome relativo é usado para se referir a coisas e situações.

    E) refer back to quantifiers.= ser substituídos por quantificadores Como a palavra já está dizendo, quantificadores são aqueles que expressam quantidade. Como por exemplo, every (cada), much (muito). Não tem lógica dizer que os pronomes relativos poderiam ser substituídos por quantificadores em geral. Errada.

  • a-

    He met someone who knew....

    A relative pronoun connects a clause or phrase to a noun or pronoun. In other words, they replace a speech part so as to avoid repetition of a noun that must be referred to more than once. (e.g.: John is coming over so make John a sandwich as I have heard that John likes sandwiches since John was in the army...). Common relative pronouns include who, whom, which, whoever, whomever, whichever, and that.

    A única opção que sugere um pronome relativo é 'a'. which tmabém é relativo, mas não é usado para pessoas ( o equivalente seria "whom").


ID
1396450
Banca
FUNCAB
Órgão
SEE-AC
Ano
2014
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Read the text below and answer the questions that follow:

Teaching English as a foreign language teacher: job description

Teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL) involves teaching adults and children whose first or main language is not English. This can be done in the UK or abroad and the students may be learning English for either business or leisure reasons.

Teaching English to speakers of other languages (TESOL) is also a widely used term and often means the same thing as TEFL. It’s sometimes specifically used to refer to teaching English to people who are living in the UK but who do not speak English as a first language. These students are most commonly refugees and immigrants and need to learn the language in order to help them settle into the UK society.Their courses are often government funded.

Teaching English as a second language (TESL) or teaching English as an additional language (TEAL) may also be terms that are used but they generally all refer to the same thing - teaching English to someone whose native language is not English.

Teachers of English as a foreign language can work in a variety of settingswith different age ranges. This can include commercial language schools, schools and institutions of further and higher education throughout the UK and overseas. Some may also teach in industry, while others are self-employed. Classes are usually taught in English, evenwith beginners. Teaching English as a foreign language teacher: job description

Adapted from: < www.prospects.ac.uk/case-studies-working- abroad>

The relative pronoun WHOSE was used in the first and third paragraphs. It can also be used in:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Gabarito C. Segundo o Cambridge: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english-portuguese/whose


  • whose

    pronoun, determiner /huːz/

    * used to ask who something belongs to or who someone or something is connected with

    de quem

    Whose gloves are these?

    Whose car shall we use?


    * used for adding information about a person or thing just mentioned

    cujo

    The story was about a man whose family came from Russia.

    It was an old house whose owner had died.

    (letra c)

  • WHOSE - CUJA, DE QUEM



ID
1435603
Banca
IBFC
Órgão
SEAP-DF
Ano
2013
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Choose the alternative with the correct words for the following gaps:

I. “ I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation____ they will not be judged by the color of theirskin, but by the content of their character.” - Martin Luther King, Jr.
II. “First they ignore you,____ they laugh at you,____ they fight you,____ you win.” - Mahatma Gandhi
III. “The sad truth is that most evil is done by people_____ never make up their minds to be good or evil” - Hannah Arendt

Alternativas
Comentários
  • which - coisas

    who - pessoas

  • RESOLUÇÃO:

    Where

    Podemos utilizar “where” em uma relative clause para se referir a um lugar.

    the restaurant – we had lunch there – it was near the airport

    o restaurante – nós almoçamos lá – ele ficava próximo do aeroporto

     The restaurant where we had lunch was near the airport.

    O restaurante onde nós almoçamos ficava próximo do aeroporto.

    Exemplos:

    I recently went back to the town where I grew up. (or ...the town I grew up in or ...the town that I grew up in)

    Recentemente, eu voltei à cidade que eu cresci. 

    I would like to live in a place where there is plenty of sunshine.

    Eu gostaria de morar em um lugar onde tenha muito sol.

    Observe que “where” é a resposta correta para a lacuna do item I, pois está se referindo a nação (nation), ou seja, um lugar. Assim, está em de acordo com a regra acima.

    I. “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation                   where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” - Martin Luther King, Jr. 

       "Eu tenho um sonho de que meus quatro filhos pequenos um dia viverão em uma nação onde eles não serão julgados pela cor de sua pele, mas pelo conteúdo de seu caráter." - Martin Luther King, Jr.

    Then

    “Then” é utilizado para se referir a um evento (ou eventos) após outro.

    Exemplo:

    At first there was silence. Then came a voice that I knew. 

    (Primeiramente havia silêncio. Depois veio uma voz que eu conhecia.)

    Perceba que, na frase do item II, há uma sequência de eventos.

    II. “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,     then you win.” - Mahatma Gandhi 

       "Primeiro eles te ignoram, depois eles riem de você, depois lutam contra você, depois você ganha." - Mahatma Gandhi

    Who

    Utiliza-se “who” em uma relative clause para se referir a uma pessoa (não a coisas).

    the woman – she lives next door – is a doctor

    a mulher – ela mora ao lado – é médica

     The woman who lives next door is a doctor.

    A mulher que mora ao lado é médica.

    we know a lot of people – they live in the country

    nós conhecemos muitas pessoas – elas moram no campo

     We know a lot of people who live in the country.

    Nós conhecemos muitas pessoas que moram no campo.

    Exemplos:

    An architect is someone who designs buildings.

    (Um arquiteto é alguém que projeta prédios.)

    What was the name of the person who phoned?

    (Qual era o nome da pessoa que telefonou?)

    Em alguns casos, também pode ser utilizado “that” (ao invés de “who”), mas “which” não deve ser usado para pessoas:

    Exemplo:

    The woman that lives next door is a doctor. (not the woman which)

    (A mulher que mora ao lado é médica.)

    Veja que “who” está se referindo a pessoas (people) e, portanto, está cumprindo a regra explicada acima.

    III. “The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be good or evil” - Hannah Arendt 

       "A triste verdade é que a maior parte do mal é realizado por pessoas que nunca decidem se são boas ou más" - Hannah Arendt

    Gabarito: Alternativa C


ID
1471822
Banca
IDECAN
Órgão
CBM-MG
Ano
2015
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

                              Mysterious ancient cemetery in Egypt could contain a million mummies


            A mysterious ancient cemetery in Egypt could contain more than a million mummified human remains, archaeologists have claimed.
            Around 1,700 bodies have so far been uncovered at the Fag el-Gamous (Way of the Water Buffalo) site, around 60 miles south of Cairo. But experts believe that countless more are contained in the burial ground.
            “We are fairly certain we have over a million burials within this cemetery. It's large, and it's dense,” said project director Kerry Muhlestein, an associate professor in the Department of Ancient Scripture at Brigham Young University (BYU), which has been examining the site for around 30 years.             They were placed there between the 1st and the 7th centuries AD, but the scale of the site has left many baffled.             A nearby village has been deemed too small to warrant such a large cemetery, while the closest major settlements had their own burial grounds.
            “It's hard to know where all these people were coming from,” Professor Muhlestein told Live Science.
            Another interesting find was that the corpses appeared to be grouped together by hair colour, with one section containing the remains of those with blonde hair and another for those with red hair.             The bodies, which included a man of more than seven feet in height, are thought to be of ordinary citizens, rather than the royalty found at many famous Egyptian sites. They were not buried in coffins, according to Muhlestein, and were in fact mummified not by design but by the arid natural environment.
            “The people in the cemetery represent the common man. They are the average people who are usually hard to learn about because they are not very visible in written sources. A lot of their wealth, or the little that they had, was poured into these burials.”
            His team discovered objects including glassware, jewellery and linen. The findings were presented to the Scholars Colloquim at the Society for the Study of Egyptian Antiquities in Toronto last month.
The Telegraph, London.

                              (http://www.traveller.com.au/mysterious-ancient-cemetery-in-egypt-could-contain-a-
                                                                                                                              million-mummies-12aaq7
.)



In: “The bodies, which included a man of more than seven feet in height are thought to be of ordinary citizens, rather than the royalty found at many famous Egyptian sites.” WHICH is a:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Usage Note: The relative pronoun which can sometimes refer to a clause or sentence, as opposed to a noun phrase: She ignored him, which proved to be unwise. They swept the council elections, which could never have happened under the old rules. More than 80 percent of the Usage Panel approved both of these examples in our 2009 survey. Sometimes which clauses of this sort are presented as separate sentences. These are technically sentence fragments, and they often pack a rhetorical punch: "I was caught for a week on the Siachen Glacier, in a giant blizzard. There is no harsher place on this earth; it belongs to no one. Which won't keep people from squabbling over it someday" (Andrea Barrett). While this example is perfectly acceptable, writers who want to avoid this use of which and adhere to the traditional rules can usually substitute this for it at the start of a new sentence, though often at the loss of some dramatic flair. · Note that which clauses that modify whole sentences can sometimes create ambiguities. The sentence It emerged that Martha made the complaint, which surprised everybody may mean either that the complaint itself was surprising or that it was surprising that Martha made it. This ambiguity may be avoided by using other constructions such as It emerged that Martha made the complaint, a revelation that surprised everybody. Remember that which is used in this way only when the clause or sentence it refers to precedes it. When the clause or sentence follows, writers must use what, particularly in formal style: Still, he has not said he will withdraw, which is more surprising. Still, what is more surprising, he has not said he will withdraw.

  • Em: "Os corpos, que (which) incluíram um homem de mais de sete pés de altura ...........",
    Que (which)  é um:

    "which" pode ser usado como pronome interrogativo, quando temos um número limitado de opções.
    Por exemplo:
    Which color do you prefer? Black or white?

    E pode ser usado também como pronome relativo.
    Ex: 
    There are several small ponds which a variety of fish live in.
    No caso da questão acima, which está sendo usado como pronome relativo.
    Alternativa B




  • Which = qual = pronome relativo.

  • Wich , Who , Whose, That = pronome relativos recorrentes nas questões.

    LETRA B

    APMBB


ID
1505590
Banca
Gestão Concurso
Órgão
CEMIG-TELECOM
Ano
2014
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Leia as sentenças abaixo:

I. The waiter that served me at the coffe shop moved away.
II. He saw that the bottles were empty.
III. Carla told me that she was going to quit the restaurant where she works in.
IV. I didn’t get the job that I applied for.

Em qual (is) das sentenças acima o uso do pronome relativo em negrito é extremamente necessário?

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Quando usar o THAT ou não:


    1- Você pode omití-lo quando se está diante de um pronome pessoal:


    EX:  I saw the sofa you bought yesterday. ( Eu vi o sofá que você comprou ontem.)



    2- Não podemos omití-lo quando se está diante de um verbo(ocupa o lugar do sujeito) ou de um advérbio:


    EX: Please, take the books THAT are on the shelf. ( Por favor, pegue os livros que estão na prateleira.)


           I have a radio THAT hardly works. ( Eu tenho um rádio que dificilmente funciona.)

  • a-

    Pronome relativo é opcional em oração subordinada substantiva. Para orações subordinadas adjetivas restritivas, é obrigatorio


ID
1663963
Banca
NC-UFPR
Órgão
ITAIPU BINACIONAL
Ano
2015
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

                                             Smart Greenhouse

Control the light, watering, temperature, and humidity of your greenhouse – automatically.

                                                                                                                                  Kevin Farnham

      Smart Greenhouse, one of three professional category winner in the 2014 IoT Developer Challenge, is an Internet of Things (IoT) device and application that monitors and controls a greenhouse environment. The concept for Smart Greenhouse came into being after the core team – Dzmitry Yasevich, Pavel Vervenko, and Vladimir Redzhepov – attended JavaOne Russia in April 2013. There, the team saw presentations of a smart house, various robots, and other devices, all controlled by Java.

      Yasevich notes, “We were impressed by these solutions and had an idea to do something like that. Pavel Vervenko suggested making an automated greenhouse. Everyone liked the idea!”.

      First, the team selected the hardware. “We started to use Raspberry Pi as a basis”, Yasevich says. “It is a compact but fullfedged computer with 700 MHz and memory at 512 MB. This system costs around $35”.

      However, early on, a safety concern arose. “Current under high voltage passes in the greenhouse, and there is an automatic watering system, so it was necessary to properly consider all the aspects related to insulation”, Yasevich says.

(http://www.oraclejavamagazine-digital.com/8ef38d6e6f63e8971b9487ddb4bd4bdc/558dae0a/pp/javamagazine20150304-1429053481000c51ce41 0c1-pp.pdf?lm=1429053481000)

In the first sentence of the text, the underlined word “that" refers to: 

Alternativas
Comentários
  • d-

     

    A backwards in-text reference like the pronoun 'that' is termed an anaphora.

     

    Anaphora is a pronoun referring back to another entity. The context-relying word word or phrase is an anaphor, while preceding one the antecedent or head.

     

    When it refers forward, it's called cataphora. Both anaphora and cataphora are types of endophora - a contextual reference. 


ID
1820665
Banca
ACAFE
Órgão
SED-SC
Ano
2015
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Teen romance usually digitally enhanced, says US study

Technology plays a key role in teenage romance from initial encounters to eventual break-ups, says a US study. 

Teenagers rarely meet online but do use technology for flirting, asking out, meeting up and parting, American think tank, the Pew Research Center, found. A survey of 1,060 US teenagers aged 13 to 17 revealed that technology brings them closer but also breeds jealousy.

"Digital platforms are powerful tools for teens," said Amanda Lenhart, lead author of the report from Pew. "But even as teens enjoy greater closeness with partners and a chance to display their relationships for others to see, mobile and social media can also be tools for jealousy, meddling and even troubling behaviour."

Digital romance, broken down

Of the 1,060 teenagers surveyed:

• 35% said they were currently dating and 59% of that group said technology made them feel closer to their partner

   • For boys who were dating, 65% said social media made them more connected to a significant other while it was 52% for girls

   • 27% of dating teenagers thought social media made them feel jealous or insecure in relationships

   • 50% of all teens surveyed, dating or not, said they had indicated interest by friending someone on Facebook or other social media and 47% expressed attraction by likes and comments 

• Texting is king - 92% of teens who were dating said they texted a partner, assuming the partner would check in with "great regularity"

• Jealousy happens, but not as much as flirting does - 11% of teenage daters reported accessing a partner's online accounts and 16% reported having a partner asking them to de-friend someone

What gets discussed during all those frequent social media enabled check-ins? According to the survey, it is mostly "funny stuff" followed by "things you're thinking about" as well as other Information such as where they are and what their friends have been doing. And forget having to meet up to resolve a conflict - 48% of dating teenagers said that could be done by texting or talking online. Online tools, with their accessibility and ease of use, also showed some signs of giving this group relationship anxiety. Females are more likely to be subject to unwanted flirting and 25% of teenagers surveyed said they have blocked or unfriended someone because of uncomfortable flirting. And 15% of teenage daters said a partner had used the internet to pressure them into unwanted sexual activity.

'More than emojis'


Nearly half the respondents admitted to concentrating on their phone ahead of their partner when together with 43% of dating teens saying that had happened to them. "I don't think this survey reveals much that is surprising. But it is affirming. Humans are social animals and we build tools to connect with each other, "wrote Julie Beck, an associate editor at The Atlantic news site, of the survey's findings.

"It's not all heart emojis all the time, no, but the tools that facilitate relationships facilitate all aspects of them, good and bad.


"Connecting with others is scary, hard, sometimes dangerous, but usually, hopefully, good. The teens get it." 

(Fonte: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34416989) 

The relative pronoun "Who" in the sentence "For boys who were dating, 65% said social media made them more connected to a significant," can be replaced by which or the pronouns below?

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Who, whom e which podem ser substituídos por that.

  • According with Richmond(2004) we can both use whom and that to replace who.


ID
1847530
Banca
Exército
Órgão
EsPCEx
Ano
2012
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

                       Fire at Antarctica station kills 2 Brazilian sailors

      Two Brazilian sailors died and one was injured Saturday after a fire broke out at a naval research station in Antarctica, authorities reported. The fire occurred at the Comandante Ferraz Station on King George Island, said Adm. Julio Soares de Moura Neto, commander of the Brazilian Navy. The three sailors were trying to extinguish a fire that broke out in the engine room of the facility. Brazilian military police are investigating the cause. The station is home to researchers who conduct studies on the effects of climate change in Antarctica and its implications on the planet, according to the Ministry of Science and Technology and Innovation. Researchers at the base also study marine life and the atmosphere.


                                          Adaptado de http://articles.cnn.com, consulta em 26/02/2012

In the sentence “The station is home to researchers who conduct studies...", the word who refers to

Alternativas
Comentários
  • "A estação é lar para pesquisadores que conduzem estudos..."

    "who" funciona como um pronome relativo e retoma o substantativo researchers.

    GABARITO: LETRA B

  • who = Quem

    researchers = Pesquisadores

  • The station is home to researchers who conduct studies.

    Who- está se referindo a um grupo seleto de PESSOAS ( pesquisadores )

    Pergunte-se : quem conduz os estudos ? = os pesquisadores.

    LETRA B

    APMBB

  • b de bbb


ID
1850965
Banca
Exército
Órgão
EsPCEx
Ano
2015
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Children experience basic training and mock deployment

    The 460th Force Support Squadron (FSS) hosted the 6th Annual Operation Future Forces (OFF) Sept. 13, 2014, at Camp Rattlesnake. OFF allows children ages 8-18 to experience what military members endure from basic training to technical school to a mock deployment, ending with a homecoming party.
  “The youth mock deployment was developed to alleviate many of the stresses commonly experienced by young family members when one or both parents are deployed,” said Thomas Cox, 460th FSS youth program chief. “Everything from basic training, tech schools, camp activities and accomplishing their mission as a team made the event a one of a kind opportunity for military kids.”
   A few of the boys had their heads shaved before heading off to “Basic Military Training.” The training consisted of doing push-ups and sit-ups, jumping through hula-hoops and running through an inflatable castle. They were also taught how to stand at attention, salute and do an about-face.
    After basic training, each child attended “technical school” and was taught a specific Air Force Specialty Code to help them in their mock deployment. Some children were taught lifesaving self-aid and buddy care skills while others learned about the importance of radio communications while on a deployment.
   The tech-school graduates were then issued water pistols before heading out. During their deployment, the children encountered hostile and non-hostile citizens, a water-balloon fight and injured allies who needed help along the way.
   At the end of a long day, loved ones waited outside the youth center on base with homemade signs welcoming the “troops” back home.
   “This event was great,” said Senior Airman Jasmine Madison, 460th FSS Force Support Force Management technician. “It’s a way for kids to get a hands-on understanding of what their parents do when they are separated from them during deployments.”

Adapted from http://www.buckley.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123424927

In the sentence “During their deployment, the children encountered hostile and non-hostile citizens, a water-balloon fight and injured allies who needed help along the way." (paragraph 5), the words their and who respectively refer to

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Na frase "Durante  sua implantação, as crianças encontraram cidadãos hostis e não-hostis, uma luta de balão de água e aliados feridos que precisavam de ajuda ao longo do caminho." (Nº 5), as palavras "their" e "who", respectivamente, referem-se a
    A) às crianças e aos cidadãos.
    B) pistolas de água e aliados feridos.
    C) às crianças e aliados feridos.
    D) implantação e cidadãos não-hostis.
    E) graduados e uma luta de balão de água.
    O possessivo adjetivo "their" e  o pronome relativo  " who" referem-se "as crianças" e "aos aliados feridos"
    Alternativa C.
  • “During their deployment, ..." durante sua implementação. Lembre-se que o THEIR é um POSSESSIVE ADJECTIVE, então para achar a referência, vc deve perguntar para o substantivo: Implantação de quem? Das crianças. The children encountered hostile and non-hostile citizens, a water-balloon fight and injured allies who needed help along the way."

    who needed help along the way." Que precisaram de ajuda ao longo do caminho. O pronome relativo who faz retomada ao termo anterior. Who needed help que precisaram de ajuda. Pergunte-se: quem precisou de ajuda? Injured allies who needed help.... aliados feridos que precisaram de ajuda.

    Gabarito: C) the children and injured allies.

    Veja esta e outras resoluções de questões em videoaulas no canal:

    youtube.com/professorthiagoenglish

  • Crianças experimentam treinamento básico e implantação simulada

      O 460º Esquadrão de Apoio à Força (FSS) sediou a 6ª Operação Anual das Forças do Futuro (OFF) em 13 de setembro de 2014, no acampamento Rattlesnake. O OFF permite que crianças de 8 a 18 anos vivenciem o que os militares suportam, desde o treinamento básico até a escola técnica e uma simulação de implantação, terminando com uma festa de regresso.

     “A implantação simulada para jovens foi desenvolvida para aliviar muitos dos estresses comumente experimentados por jovens membros da família quando um ou ambos os pais são implantados”, disse Thomas Cox, chefe do programa 460º FSS para jovens. “Tudo, desde treinamento básico, escolas de tecnologia, atividades de acampamento e cumprimento de sua missão como uma equipe, tornou o evento uma oportunidade única para os militares.”

      Alguns dos meninos tiveram a cabeça raspada antes de seguirem para o “Treinamento Militar Básico”. O treinamento consistia em fazer flexões e abdominais, saltar sobre bambolês e correr por um castelo inflável. Eles também foram ensinados a ficar em posição de sentido, saudar e dar meia-volta.

      Após o treinamento básico, cada criança frequentou a “escola técnica” e aprendeu um Código de Especialidade da Força Aérea específico para ajudá-las em seu desdobramento simulado. Algumas crianças aprenderam habilidades de auto-ajuda para salvar vidas e cuidados com os amigos, enquanto outras aprenderam sobre a importância das comunicações por rádio durante uma implantação.

      Os formandos da escola de tecnologia receberam então pistolas d'água antes de partir. Durante a implantação, as crianças encontraram cidadãos hostis e não hostis, uma luta de balão d'água e aliados feridos que precisavam de ajuda ao longo do caminho.

      No final de um longo dia, entes queridos esperaram do lado de fora do centro da juventude na base com placas caseiras dando as boas-vindas às “tropas” de volta para casa.

      “Este evento foi ótimo”, disse o aviador Jasmine Madison, técnico do 460º FSS Force Support Force Management. “É uma maneira de as crianças obterem uma compreensão prática do que seus pais fazem quando são separados deles durante as implantações.”

    Na frase “Durante o desdobramento, as crianças encontraram cidadãos hostis e não hostis, uma luta de balão de água e aliados feridos que precisavam de ajuda ao longo do caminho.” (Parágrafo 5), as palavras deles e que, respectivamente, se referem a

    UMA

    A)as crianças e os cidadãos.

    B)pistolas de água e aliados feridos.

    C)as crianças e aliados feridos.

    D)implantação e cidadãos não hostis.

    E)graduados e uma luta de balão de água.


ID
1926556
Banca
CETRO
Órgão
ANVISA
Ano
2013
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

              Anxiety Medication: Over Prescribed and

                              Causing Overdoses

      According to a story on NBC New York, more and more patients are ending up in New York City hospitals having over dosed on Xanax. Xanax is in the benzodiaziepine family of drugs and it’s used to treat anxiety, nervousness, and panic attacks by decreasing brain activity.

Xanax Overdoses Way Up

NBC New York reports:

      Between 2004 and 2009, New York City emergency room visits involving Xanax and other anti-anxiety prescription drugs known as benzodiazepines increased more than 50 percent. That’s up from 38 out of 100,000 New Yorkers in 2004 to 59 out of 100,000 New Yorkers.

      It’s not the drug by itself that causes the overdoses, but used in combination with other drugs and alcohol, it creates a toxic cocktail which isn’t easily metabolized in the body.

      The drug is habit forming and withdrawal symptoms can include sweating, shaking, difficulty falling asleep, difficulty concentrating, depression, and nervousness. Many fear that the drug is being over prescribed. 

      “I don’t believe they take the time with the patients to figure out what the problems are,” Cali Estes, a drug counselor said to NBC New York. “A doctor who is running short on time and nurses and probably isn’t paid as much as he or she used to be finds it easier to say, ‘OK, this person has a problem, here’s your script, have a nice day. Where’s my next patient?’” 

Whitney Houston’s Death Tied to Xanax and Other Drugs

      Whitney Houston’s recent death is raising questions as to this and other sedatives. Xanax is most often criticized by those in the psychiatric community because it only lasts 6 to 20 hours.

Forbes reports: 

      On the face of it, this seems like a great combination – you get a quick hit of anxiety relief and the drug leaves your system within a 24-hour period. But in practice what often happens is that because the drug acts so quickly and dissipates quickly, the patient begins taking more of it to maintain the effect. Two pills a day turns into four, which turns into six and so forth.

      According to the CDC, prescription drug overdose is now the leading cause of accidental death in the U.S., topping automobile accidents for the first time in 30 years. Currently, Xanax is the 11th most widely prescribed drug in the nation.

                                                     Available in: http://blogs.discovery.com

Read the sentence below taken from the text and analyze the assertions.

“Two pills a day turns into four, which turns into six and so forth.”

I. The phrasal verb “to turn into” can be replaced by “in turn”.

II. “Which” refers to the last quantity of pills mentioned.

III. The expression “so forth” infers that, after having 6 pills, the patient restarts taking four pills.

The correct assertion(s) is(are)

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Correta a assertiva D:

    “Two pills a day turns into four, which turns into six and so forth.”

    “Duas pílulas por dia se transformam em quatro, que se transformam em seis e assim por diante.”

    I. The phrasal verb “to turn into” can be replaced by “in turn”.

    Falso - O verbo frasal "transformar-se em" não pode ser substituído por "por sua vez".

    II. “Which” refers to the last quantity of pills mentioned.

    Verdadeiro,pois a palavra “Que” se refere à última quantidade de pílulas mencionada, qual seja, quatro pílulas.

    III. The expression “so forth” infers that, after having 6 pills, the patient restarts taking four pills.

    Falso, pois, que se transformam em seis e assim por diante.” E não “four pills”.


ID
1926577
Banca
CETRO
Órgão
ANVISA
Ano
2013
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Read the paragraph below and choose the alternative that fills in correctly and respectively the blanks below.

“Ketamine, ________ is also a drug used recreationally to achieve a sort ______ “out of body” high, “is not ______ all ready for prime time”, said Dr. James Murrough, an associate professor of psychiatry at Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai. But it is approved ______ use in anesthesia, so it’s available legally. And years of small and preliminary trials have offered tantalizing evidence of its powerful and fast-acting antidepressant effect ______ patients whose depression has failed to yield to other treatments.”

Ketamine: a potential rescue drug for depression takes a step forward. Available in: http://www.latimes.com

Alternativas

ID
1933738
Banca
Marinha
Órgão
EFOMM
Ano
2014
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Choose the alternative where the pronoun can correctly be omitted.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Quando há algo entre o pronome e o verbo, o pronome é o objeto e pode ser omitido. Alternativa B.


ID
1934032
Banca
Marinha
Órgão
EFOMM
Ano
2013
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

In which sentence below can you leave out the relative pronoun?

Alternativas
Comentários
  • A questão pergunta qual destas sentenças é possível retirar o pronome relativo. 

    Item B. Repare que a frase "The film we saw yesterday was very interesting", sem o which tambem está correta, diferente das demais.

  • *O relative pronoun pode ser omitido quando é o objeto da oração.

  • *O pronome relativo *pode ser omitido* quando ele não é o SUJEITO da oração

ID
1956544
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2016
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Choose the alternative that contains the right use of the relative pronoun, in order to write the two sentences below as a single sentence:

That is the teacher. I spoke to her about my grades.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Quando o antecedente for pessoa e o pronome relativo exercer a função de objeto do verbo, usa-se whowhom, o pronome relativo que corresponde ao termo teacher é who ou whom. 

    Quando o pronome vier antecedido de uma preposição, temos que usar "whom"

    Exemplos: The boy about whom you were talking is my brother. (O garoto sobre quem você estava falando, é meu irmão).

    Alternativa C

  • LETRA C

  • A diferença no uso de WHO ou WHOM é que se na frase vier antecedido de preposição, nós usamos WHOM e se não vier, usa-se WHO. Como temos o about na frase que é preposição, gabarito LETRA C.

  • WHOM, pois a professora foi o objeto da ação de "I spoke"

  •  Uma dica para saber quando usar WHO ou WHOM é perguntar a si mesmo sobre a ação: se a resposta for him/her, você deve usar WHOM, e se for he/she, use WHO.


ID
1985365
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2014
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

                                  Don’t drink and ride

Alcohol can increase your risk of being hurt in a car accident, even if you aren’t behind the wheel. A new University of Michigan study reports that men who have been drinking are 50 percent more likely to experience a serious injury during a car accident than sober passengers. 

The word “who”, underlined in the text, can be replaced by

Alternativas
Comentários
  • That - Pronome relativo que pode ser usado para pessoas e coisas.

    GAB (D)

  • Complementando: That só pode ser usado em orações restritivas.

  • "That" pode substituir os pronomes relativos "WHO" e "WHICH", porém ele não vai poder substituir estes quando estiverem entre virgulas.

  • Quando o antecedente for Pessoa e o pronome relativo exercer função de sujeito, ou seja, for seguido de um verbo, usa-se who ou that.

  • Por que não pode ser a C?


ID
2003926
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2012
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Once upon a time there was a young girl ______ lived near the forest with her mother and father. She was pretty, nice and kind. So everybody loved her very much.

(Mariza Ferrari e Sarah G. Rubin)


Choose the correct alternative to fill in the blank.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Usa-se who para substituir sujeito e objeto não preposicionado ao se tratar de pessoas.

    Alternativa A)

  • Quando o antecedente for Pessoa e o pronome relativo exercer função de sujeito, ou seja, for seguido de um verbo, usa-se who ou that.


ID
2034568
Banca
Exército
Órgão
IME
Ano
2014
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Para a questão, encontram-se em destaque cinco termos. Assinale a alternativa correspondente ao termo cujo emprego está INCORRETO.  

If mankind can learn to respect other human beings in thoughts, words, and actions, humanity may survive on this planet, Earth. If parents teach children clearly not only to respect their elders but to treat everyone with respect and courtesy, children may grow up to be responsible adults whose influence other people to respect human feeling, rights and property. They may grow up to cherish human life, not annihilate it. All people want respect, so they must give it to earn it. 

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Whose relaciona dois substantivos , nesse caso é um substantivo (adults) e um verbo (influence).

    GAB .: LETRA C

  • Whose é o mesmo que Cujo, que se refere ao próximo termo.

    No texto pode substituir That por que, ficando assim sem sentido ter o whose.


ID
2074627
Banca
Marinha
Órgão
EFOMM
Ano
2016
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Choose the option that correctly completes the text below, respectively.

“______ half-past twelve next day Lord Henry Wotton strolled from Curzon Street over to the Albany to call on his uncle, Lord Fermor, a genial if somewhat rough-mannered old bachelor, ______ the outside world called selfish, ______ it derived no particular benefit from him, but ______ was considered generous by Society as he fed the people who amused him.”

(WILDE, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. Collins Classics.)

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Escolha a opção que preenche corretamente o texto abaixo, respectivamente.

           "Ao meio-dia e meia do dia seguinte, Lord Henry Wotton caminhou da rua Curzon para a Albany para chamar seu tio, Lord Fermor, um  velho solteirão meio rude, a quem o mundo  chamava de egoísta, porque não era comum se beneficiar dele, mas que  foi considerado generoso pela sociedade com o fato de alimentar as pessoas que o divertiam. "

    As palavras que completam as lacunas são: at, whom, because, who.

    Gabarito: Letra D.

  • Pronomes relativos

    Who = relativo ao sujeito 

    Whom =  relativo ao objeto 

    WHO = quem (executores da ação) 

    Ex: " Who is the president of the United States?" , " She is the one who feeds our dog" , " I have an uncle who works for Apple" 

    WHOM = a quem, com quem, para quem. (recebedores da ação) 

    WHOM é utilizado como objeto da frase.

    ex: "Whom (a quem) did you invite?" or "Whom (a quem) is he firing at the office?" , " Gandhi is someone whom most people admire"

    "That's the guy whom she married"

    WHOSE = De quem, pronome possessivo. (Ideia de posse) 

    ex: "Whose is that dog?",  "Whose goals we are talking about, mine or yours?" 


ID
2173897
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2016
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Read the text and answer question.

Another plane returns to Guarulhos airport

    For the second day consecutive, an airplane had to return to Guarulhos airport, after being hit by birds.

    The incident happened on Wednesday (27) with a Boeing 737- 800 belonging to the airline Gol _____ took off for Fortaleza. The bird entered one of the two motors, causing serious troubles. Because of the problem, the plane returned to Guarulhos almost two hours after taking off. The aircraft had to use fuel to land with less weight.

Choose the word to have the text completed:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Análise das alternativas:

    Letters B, C and D are not correct because the pronouns do not fit in the blank space. Who is used as the subject or object of a verb to show which person you are referring to, or to add information about a person just mentioned; it is used for people, not things. Whose is used to indicate possession by people and animals. Whom is used often with a preposition, in formal styles or in writing, rarely in a conversation.

    As alternativas B, C e D não estão corretas pois  os pronomes não se encaixam no espaço em branco. Who é usado como sujeito ou objeto de um verbo para mostrar a qual pessoa está se referindo, ou para adicionar informações sobre uma pessoa mencionada; é usado para pessoas e não para coisas. Whose é usado para indicar posse, de pessoas ou animais. Whom é usado geralmente com uma preposição, em estilos formais ou na escrita, raramente em uma conversa.

    Gabarito do professor: Letra A

    Letter A is correct because which is used to refer to animals and things. Which, in the text, is referring to the airline Gol.

    A letra A está correta pois which é usado para animais e coisas. Which, no texto, está se referindo à airline Gol.







  • Letra A - Which, pq a oração se refere a um objeto, que nesse caso é o Boeing da companhia aérea Gol.

  • "Gabarito do professor: Letra A

    Letter A is correct because which is used to refer to animals and things. Which, in the text, is referring to the airline Gol.

    A letra A está correta pois which é usado para animais e coisas. Which, no texto, está se referindo à airline Gol"

    --------

    Não concordo com o comentário do professor. Acredito que a referência do pronome é o Boeing 737.

    a Boeing 737- 800 belonging to the airline Gol which took off for Fortaleza

    a Boeing 737- 800 took off for Fortaleza

    "belonging to the airline Gol" é um termo complementar no período.

    Qualquer desinformação me avise!

  • which >> coisas


ID
2190139
Banca
NUCEPE
Órgão
Prefeitura de Teresina - PI
Ano
2016
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

“Mr. Preaud and his wife, who is pregnant, hit the ground as people screamed, “Get down, get down!” After the second explosion, he looked up to see a giant fan — part of an air-conditioning unit — that had landed near them. They had been eating at a Délifrance, talking about Salah Abdeslam, the terrorism suspect who was arrested in Brussels on Friday after a four-month global manhunt.”
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/23/world/europe /brussels (adapted). Access: March 23rd, 2016.  

The clause “who is pregnant”, in “Mr. Preaud and his wife, who is pregnant, hit the ground as people screamed, “Get down, get down!” is a

Alternativas
Comentários
  • WHO é um pronome relativo!

  • -c

    Relative clauses are set off with the relative pronouns who, that, which, whose, where and when. They are used when it's necessary to define the noun that precedes them.


ID
2190196
Banca
NUCEPE
Órgão
Prefeitura de Teresina - PI
Ano
2016
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

TEXT 05
What is English as a Lingua Franca
What students need most from their language classes affects how we teach. But to what extent do we consider students' needs when it comes to pronunciation? How often do we stop to consider the needs of students who are learning English to mainly communicate with other non-native speakers? In this situation, English is used as a Lingua Franca ( henceforth ELF) - a common language between people who do not share the same native language. So their needs are quite different to students who go to the UK, for example, and want to integrate within that culture and so may want to sound as much like a native speaker as possible. The priority for students using ELF, on the other hand, is to be as intelligible as possible to the people they are communicating with. This does not necessarily mean sounding like a native speaker.
Source: adapted from https://www.britishcouncil.org/voicesmagazine/how-teach-english-lingua-franca-elf. Access: March 24th , 2016.  

In the sentence "How often do we stop to consider the needs of students who are learning English to mainly communicate with other non-native speakers?" (lines 04 to 08), the relative pronoun can be substituted, without change of meaning, by:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • c-

    Who, that and which are all relative pronouns in a sentence or clause, referring back to a person or thing previously mentioned. A major distinction between that, which, and who depends on whether the speaker is making a reference to people or things. 

    'That' and 'which' are the relative pronouns to refer to things.  You should  only use 'who' to refer to a person or people . However, 'that' can also be ued to refer to people in an unspecifc way: 
    'Most passers-through that walk out front don't notice that green sheen on the pavement'.


ID
2190211
Banca
NUCEPE
Órgão
Prefeitura de Teresina - PI
Ano
2016
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

TEXT 06
The (in)appropriate speaker model?
"Anyone working in the field of English as a Lingua Franca (henceforth ELF) has to face sooner rather than later a serious contradiction: that despite the widespread acceptance of the extensive role of English as an international lingua franca and its increasing number of functions in this respect, there is still an almost equally widespread resistance to this lingua franca’s forms. Given the well-established sociolinguistic fact that languages are shaped by their users, and that nowadays “native speakers are in a minority for [English] language use” (Brumfit 2001, 116), it would make sense for English language teaching to move away from its almost exclusive focus on native varieties of English. This suggestion always meets, however, with strong resistance from many quarters, and this is particularly so in the case of accent. The result is that two particular native speaker English accents, Received Pronunciation (RP) and General American (GA), continue to command special status around the English speaking world including international/lingua franca communication contexts where sociolinguistic common sense indicates that they are inappropriate and irrelevant." 
Source: adapted from: JENKINS, J. (Un)pleasant? (In)correct? (Un)Intelligible? ELF Speakers' perceptions of their accents. In: MAURANEN, Anna and RANTA, Elina (Ed.).English as a Lingua Franca:Studies and Findings. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009, p.10-35.  

Without changes in meaning, the word that in “...sociolinguistic common sense indicates that they are inappropriate and irrelevant” (lines 28 and 29) can be:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • b-


    When 'that' is used as a conjunction -joining a main and a dependent clause-  'that' can be left out without affecting the overall meaning of the sentence.


ID
2301532
Banca
Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro - RJ
Órgão
Prefeitura de Rio de Janeiro - RJ
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Read the following article and answer question based on the text.

Faced with the unprecedented stream of migrants fleeing war and trauma in the Middle East and North Africa, Europe needs to take clear-sighted action.

        For its part, the UK has agreed to take 20,000 refugees, a significant portion of whom will likely be children and orphans according to report. One key aspect in ensuring their smooth settlement in the UK will be providing these refugees with language training.

       Many Syrians are well-educated and many speak fluent English. Others, however, do not speak English well enough to function professionally within the UK. The issue of language is so fundamental to our lives that we often overlook it. Several multi-million pound training contracts have failed to be delivered on account of not addressing the language barrier. All the goodwill, financial backing, and technical expertise to deliver needed medical, economic, military,engineering, or navigational training may be present; but unless there is a shared language in which to impart that knowledge, little will be accomplished.

        One of the biggest misconceptions about language is that if you “just go to the country,” you’ll pick it up. Many people believe that immersion will guarantee fluency; yet you may well know several immigrants who have been in this country for years and still only speak broken English. You might also know dozens of expats in various countries across the world who have failed to pick up the local languages of their host countries. Training and effort are both necessary.

        Though not a guarantee of fluency, immersion is a wonderful opportunity. The first issue we need to address with respect to refugees is ensuring that those who come will actually be immersed. That is, that they will be welcomed as part of larger communities, and not simply join communities of other refugees. On the other hand, immersion is just an opportunity, and in order to take full advantage of it, training and education are required. In terms of refugees, we need to consider options for the provision of language training, whether by self-study, classroom instruction, private tuition, or some combination of the three.        

       The array of needs is staggering. In truth, every language learner has a different set of learning objectives, and will require different training to meet those objectives. Coordinating the actual needs with providers in different regions and accounting for different personal schedules and start dates is a significant challenge. It is, however, a challenge that must be addressed immediately, as proficiency in English will be a key enabler of success for refugees in this country.

(Adapted from Aaron Ralby http://www.blogs.jbs.cam.ac.uk/ socialinnovation/2015/11/16/)

In the excerpt “a significant portion of whom” (paragraph 1), the pronoun “whom” refers to:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Alternativa: d) the refugees. 

    Bons estudos!

  • WHOM = utiliza-se quando estiver relacionando pessoas a um verbo


ID
2321431
Banca
Exército
Órgão
EsFCEx
Ano
2016
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Which of the relative clauses below modifies the object of the sentence?

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Relative Clauses(Pron. Relativo)

     

    Reiteram a informação (qualidade – adjetivo, portanto) do substantivo. Eles podem ser:

    Who (que/qual – utilizado para pessoas);

    Which (qual – utilizado para coisas);

    Whose (cujo);

    That (que – Sujeito/Objeto, Pessoa/Coisa);

    Whom (que – Pessoas, Objeto).

    Das alternativas apresentadas, a única cujo pronome relativo modifica o objeto da frase (ou ocupa a posição de objeto é a letra E):  

     

  • I (subject) can't find (what?) the person(object) to whom you talked (this modifies the object that no longer is just a simple person)

  • A presente questões envolve o estudo dos Pronomes Relativos e das orações subordinadas relativas, bem como o conhecimento de análise sintática. Isso porque, o candidato deve indicar qual das orações relativas relacionadas modifica o objeto da oração.

    As “Relative Clauses" [Orações Relativas] são orações subordinadas que trazem informações a respeito de uma pessoa, objeto ou ideia da oração principal. Ou seja, elas complementam a oração principal, criando uma frase mais complexa.

    Elas equivalem às orações subordinadas adjetivas do português. E funcionam como um complemento de um substantivo da oração principal, o antecedente, informando detalhes ou especificações sobre ele.

    Logo, para resolvermos a questão, basta identificarmos a oração relativa cujo antecedente é o objeto da oração principal.

    Vamos às alternativas.

    Alternativa A.
    ERRADA. A oração relativa “who lives near me" qualifica “boy" , que é o sujeito da oração principal “The boy has four cats."

    Alternativa B.
    ERRADA. A oração subordinada relativa “which end in death" restring o antecedente “stories" que é o sujeito da oração principal “Stories make me cry".

    Alternativa C.
    ERRADA. A oração relativa “that she could fly" refere-se a “idea", sujeito da oração “The idea is completely nonsense."

    Alternativa D.
    ERRADA. A oração relativa restritiva “whose father died yesterday" diz respeito a “girl", que é o sujeito da oração principal “The girl will move to China."

    Alternativa E.
    CORRETA. A oração relativa “to whom you talked" refere-se a “person" que é o objeto da oração “I can't find the person". É “person" que sofre a ação “can´t be found" (ou seja, é a pessoa que não pode ser encontrada pelo sujeito “I").


    Gabarito do Professor: Letra E.

ID
2341180
Banca
IDECAN
Órgão
CBM-DF
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

      American jazz is a trove of sounds borrowed from such varied sources as American and African folk music, European classical music, and Christian gospel songs. One of the recognizable traits of jazz is its use of improvisation: certain parts of the music are written out and played the same way by various performers, and other improvised parts are created spontaneously during a performance and vary widely from performer to performer.

      The root form of jazz was ragtime, lively songs or rags performed on the piano, and the best-known of the ragtime performers and composers was Scott Joplin. Born in the 1868 to former slaves, Scott Joplin earned his living from a very early age playing the piano in bars around the Mississippi. One of these regular jobs was in the Maple Leaf Club in Sedalia, Missouri. It was there that he began writing the more than 500 compositions that he was to produce, the most famous of which was “The Maple Leaf Rag”.

        (Longman Preparation Course for the TOEFL, Deborah Philips Adapted.)

About the fragment “It was there that he began writing the more than 500 compositions that he was to produce” it is correct to state that:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • podemos tirar o than

    d) The relative pronouns can be omited

  •  vamos ao assunto propriamente dito do post de hoje: o pronome relativo pode ser omitido quando ele se referir ao objeto. Calma, calma! Já simplifico pra você! Como não é muito fácil para o aprendiz reconhecer quando o pronome se refere ao objeto, vou revelar um segredo: se o pronome relativo se refere ao objeto, o verbo seguinte já tem seu sujeito. Veja estes exemplos para que fique mais claro:

    She is the girl. She came here. (She: sujeito de came)
    She is the girl who came here. (who: sujeito de came; não posso omitir)

    She is the girl. We saw the girl there. (the girl: objeto de saw)
    She is the girl who we saw there.*(who: objeto de saw; posso omitir)

    https://www.englishexperts.com.br/omissao-do-pronome-relativo-no-ingles/

  • Você tem certeza que o THAN é pronome relativo?

     

  • Than é preposição. Cuidado ao fazer os comentários se não tiver certeza. Tanto é que a letra c) está errada por tem DUAS preposições ( than e to).

  • O pronome relativo que pode ser omitido é o THAT .

    Quando o antecedente for coisa ou animal e o pronome relativo
    exercer a função de objeto da oração, usa-se which, that ou pode-se
    omitir (—) o pronome relativo. Contudo, essa omissão SÓ PODE
    OCORRER quando o pronome relativo exercer função de objeto.

    Caso o pronome relativo seja seguido por um substantivo, artigo, pronome ou outra classe de
    palavra que não seja um verbo, ele exerce função de objeto.

     


ID
2387620
Banca
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão
SEDF
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Text 19A3AAA
The transfer of patterns from the native language is undoubtedly one of the major sources of errors in learner language. However, there are other causes for errors too, one of which is overgeneralization of target-language rules. For example, research has shown that second-language learners from different first-language backgrounds often make the same kinds of errors when learning a particular second language. In such cases, second-language errors are evidence of the learners’ efforts to discover the structure of the target language itself rather than attempts to transfer patterns from their first language. Interestingly, some of these errors are remarkably similar to the kinds of errors made by first language learners.
These observations are a strong indication that second language learning is not simply a process of putting second-language words into first-language sentences. Research has also shown that aspects of the second language which are different from the first language will not necessarily be acquired later or with more difficulty than those aspects which are similar.
On the other hand, when errors are caused by the overextension of some partial similarity between the first and second languages, these errors may be difficult to overcome. This may be particularly problematic if learners are frequently in contact with other learners who make the same errors.
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 165 (adapted).

Judge the following item according to text 19A3AAA.

The sentence “However, there are other causes for errors too, one of which is overgeneralization of target-language rules” would remain correct if “which” were replaced with them in the clause “one of which is overgeneralization”.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • which = Pronome Relativo -> se refere a termos citados anteriormente. No caso, "[...] other causes for errors [...]"

     

    them = Object Pronoun -> serve para substituir os objetos diretos ou indiretos. Exemplo: I love Bob. (Eu amo o Bob).

                                                                                                                                      I love him. (Eu o amo).

  • Julgue o seguinte item de acordo com o texto 19A3AAA.
    A frase "No entanto, há outras causas para erros também, uma das quais é a supergeneralização das regras de linguagem-alvo" que permaneceria correta se "which (quais)" fosse substituído por them (elas) na frase "uma das quais é a supergeneralização".
    O pronome relativo "which" não pode ser substituído pelo pronome objetivo "them"
    O item está errado.

    Gabarito do professor: ERRADO.

  • Os comentarios dos alunos são mais explicativos que dos professores.

  • Os comentários dessa professora são horríveis!!!!

  • Essa professora é horrorosa...

    Ok, "them" poderia ser usado se a vírgula fosse substituída por "and": “However, there are other causes for errors too and one of them is overgeneralization of target-language rules”.

    Havendo a vírgula, "them" teria que ser seguido de "being": “However, there are other causes for errors too, one of them being overgeneralization of target-language rules”.

  • Apenas para complementar o comentário do Ednardo Raposo:

    A substituição não é possível, pois, em inglês, não se pode separar duas frases completas (sujeito + verbo + predicado) com vírgula. 

  • e-

     

    Resultaria em erro de pontuação:

     

    "However, there are other causes for errors too, one of them is overgeneralization of target-language rules”. X

     

    "However, there are other causes for errors too. One of them is overgeneralization of target-language rules”. V

  • "... there are other causes for errors too, one of which..." is grammatically replaced with WHOM...

    "... there are other causes for errors too, one of whom..."

  • Tá fogo...


ID
2430013
Banca
IF-PE
Órgão
IF-PE
Ano
2016
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

TEXT 1  

WHY MILLENIALS WILL SAVE US ALL  

By Joel Stein

I am about to do what old people have done throughout history: call those younger than me lazy, entitled, selfish and shallow. But I have studies! I have statistics! I have quotes from respected academics! Unlike my parents, my grandparents and my great-grandparents, I have proof.

Here’s the code, hard data: the incident of narcissistic personality disorder in nearly three times as high for people in their 20s as for the generation that’s now 65 or older, according to the National Institutes of Health; 58% more college students scored higher on a narcissism scale in 2009 than in 1982. Millennials got so many participation trophies growing up that a recent study showed that 40% believe they should be promoted every two years, regardless of performance. They are fame obsessed: three times as many middle school girls want to grow up to be a personal assistant to a famous person as want to be a senator, according to a 2007 survey; four time as many would pick the assistant job over CEO of a major corporation. They’re so convinced of their own greatness that the National Study of Youth and Religion found the guiding morality of 60% of millennials in any situation as that they’ll just be able to feel what’s right. Their development is stunted: more people ages 18 to 29 live with their parents than with a spouse, according to the 2012 Clarck University Poll of Emerging Adults. And they are lazy. In 1992, the non-profit Families and Work Institute reported that 80% of people under 23 wanted to one day have a job with greater responsibility; 10 years later, only 60% did.

Millennials consist, depending on whom you ask, of people born from 1980 to 2000. To put it more simply for them, since they grew up not having to do a lot of math in their heads, thanks to computers, the group is made up mostly of teens and 20-somethings. At 80 million strong, they are the biggest age grouping in American history. Each country’s millennials are different, but because of globalization, social media, the export of Western culture and the speed of change, millennials worldwide are more similar to one another than to old generations within their nations. Even in China, where family history is more important than any individual, the internet, urbanization and the onechild policy have created a generation as overconfident and self-involved as the Western one. And these aren’t just rich-kid problems: poor millennials have even higher rates of narcissism, materialism and technology addiction in their ghetto-fabulous lives.

They are the most threatening and exciting generation since the baby boomers brought about social revolution, not because they’re trying to take over the Establishment but because they’re growing up without one. The Industrial Revolution made individuals far more powerful - they could move to a city, start a business, read and form organizations. The information revolution has further empowered individuals by handing them the technology to compete against huge organizations: hackers vs. corporations, bloggers vs. newspapers, terrorists vs. Nation-states, YouTube directors vs. studios, app-makers vs. entire industries. Millennials don’t need us. That’s why we’re scared of them.

In the U.S, millennials are the children of baby boomers, who are also known as the Me Generation, who then produced the Me Me Me Generation, whose selfishness technology has only exarcebated. Whereas in the 1950s families displayed a wedding photo, a school photo and maybe a military photo in their homes, the average middle-class American family today walks amid 85 pictures of themselves and their pets. Millennials have come of age in the era of the quantified self, recording their daily steps on FitBit, their whereabouts every hour of every day on PlaceMe and their genetic data on 23 and Me. They have less civic engagement and lower political participation than any previous group. This is a generation that would have made Walt Whitman wonder if maybe they should try singing a song of someone else.

They got this way partly because in the 1970s, people wanted to improve kids’ chances of success by instilling self-esteem. It turns out that self-esteem is great for getting a job or hooking up at a bar but not so great for keeping a job or a relationship. “It was an honest mistake,” says Roy Baumeister, a psychology professor at Florida State University and the editor of Self-Esteem: The puzzle of Low Self-Regard. “The early findings showed that, indeed, kids with high self-esteem did better in school and were less likely to be in various kinds of trouble. It’s just that we’ve learned latter that self-esteem is a result, not a cause.” The problem is that when people try to boost self-esteem, they accidentally boost narcissism instead. “Just tell your kids you love them. It’s a better message,” says Jean Twenge, a psychology professor at San Diego State University, who wrote Generation Me and The Narcissism Epidemic. “When they’re little it seems cute to tell them they’re special or a princess or a rock star or whatever their T-shirt says. When they’re 14 it’s no longer cute.” All that self-esteem leads them to be disappointed when the world refuses to affirm how great they know they are. “This generation has the highest likelihood of having unmet expectations with respect to their careers and the lowest levels of satisfaction with their careers at the stage that they’re at,” says Sean Lyons, co-editor of Managing the New Workforce: International Perspectives on the Millennial Generation. “It is sort of a crisis of unmet expectations.”

What millennials are most famous for, besides narcissism is its effect: entitlement. If you want to sell seminars to middle managers, make them about how to deal with young employees who email the CEO directly and beg off projects they find boring. English teacher David McCullough Jr.’s address last year to Wellesley High School’s graduating class, a 12-minute reality check titled “You Are Not Special,” has nearly 2 million hits on YouTube. “Climb the mountain so you can see the world, not so the world can see you,” McCullough told the graduates. He says nearly all the response to the video has been positive, especially from millennials themselves; the video has 57 likes for every dislike. Though they’re cocky about their place in the world, millennials are also stunted, having prolonged a life stage between teenager and adult that this magazine once called twixters and will now use once again in an attempt to get that term to catch on. The idea of the teenager started in the 1920s; in 1910, only a tiny percentage of kids went to high school, so most people’s social interactions were with adults in their families or in the workplace. Now that cell phones allow kids to socialize at every hour – they send and receive an average of 88 texts a day, according to Pew – they’re living under the constant influence of their friends. “Peer pressure is anti-intellectual. It is anti-historical. It is anti-eloquence,” says Mark Bauerlein, an English professor at Emory, who wrote The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (or, Don’t Trust Anyone Under 30). “Never before in history have people been able to grow up and reach age 23 so dominated by peers. To develop intellectually you’ve got to relate to older people, older things: 17-year-olds never grow up if they’re just hanging around other 17-year-olds.” Of all the objections to Obamacare, not a lot of people argued against parents’ need to cover their kids’ health insurance until they’re 26.

Millennials are interacting all day but almost entirely through a screen. You’ve seen them at bars, sitting next to one another and texting. They might look calm, but they’re deeply anxious about missing out on something better. Seventy percent of them check their phones every hour, and many experience phantom pocket-vibration syndrome. “They’re doing a behavior to reduce their anxiety,” says Larry Rosen, a psychology professor at California State University at Dominguez Hills and the author of iDisorder. That constant search of a hit of dopamine (“Someone liked my status update!”) reduces creativity. From 1966, when the Torrance Tests of Creativity Thinking were first administered, through the mid-1980s, creativity scores in children increased. Then they dropped, falling sharply in 1998. Scores on tests of empathy similarly fell sharply, starting in 2000, likely because of both a lack to face-to-face time and higher degrees of narcissism. Not do only millennials lack the kind of empathy that allows them to feel concerned for others, but they also have trouble even intellectually understanding others’ points of view.

So, yes, we have all that data about narcissism and laziness and entitlement. But a generation’s greatness isn’t determined by data; it’s determined by how they react to the challenges that befall them. And, just as important, by how we react to them. Whether you think millennials are the new greatest generation of optimistic entrepreneurs or a group of 80 million people about to implode in a dwarf star of tears when their expectations are unmet depends largely on how you view change. Me, I choose to believe in the children. God knows they do.

Source: Time. Available at http://time.com/247/millennials-the-me-me-me-generation/ Accessed on October 24, 2016.  

In the sentence “Millennials consist, depending on whom you ask, of people born from 1980 to 2000” (paragraph 3), the relative pronoun whom refers to

Alternativas
Comentários
  • d-

    depending on whom. 'whom' is a pronoun used in the objective case, meaning the same as 'who', which is the subject of a sentence. 

    depending on whom you ask - dependendo de quem tu questiona.

    'whom' é a forma objeto do pronome relativo 'who'. 


ID
2445772
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Fill in the blank with the correct pronoun.

“An archeologist is a man_____ work is the study of ancient things.”

Alternativas
Comentários
  • "An archeologist is a man whose work is the study of ancient things."
    "Um arqueólogo é um homem cujo trabalho é o estudo das coisas antigas."

  • Complete a lacuna com o pronome correto.

    "Um arqueólogo é um homem cujo trabalho é o estudo de coisas antigas."
    cujo = whose

    Gabarito: A





  • whose faz papel de cujo. (pronome relativo)

    depois dele vem um substantivo (work)

  • Jesus te ama!

  • A PEGADINHA AI, E O WORK, PQ A GENTE CONHECE ELE COMO VERBO, POREM , ELE ESTAR EMPREGADO COMO SUBSTANTIVO, COM SUBSTANTIVO E USADO WHOSE

    QUEM SAFOU ISSO, PARABENS, QUEM NAO, SO PAPIRAAAAAAAA


ID
2504350
Banca
Marinha
Órgão
EFOMM
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Choose the correct sentence.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Escolha a sentença correta.

    A) I saw a girl who hair was blue. O pronome relativo correto a ser usado é "whose". I saw a girl whose hair was blue. (Eu vi uma garota cujo cabelo era azul.) Incorreta.

    B) Mr. Smith, which has never smiled, seems very happy today.  O pronome relativo correto a ser usado é "who", pois refere-se a uma pessoa.(Mr. Smith). Mr. Smith, who has never smiled, seems very happy today. (O Sr. Smith, que nunca sorriu, parece muito feliz hoje.) Incorreta.

    C) He got fired again, what surprised everybody. O pronome relativo correto a ser usado é "which", pois faz referência a uma oração mencionada anteriormente. He got fired again, which surprised everybody. ( Ele foi demitido novamente, o que surpreendeu a todos.) Incorreta.

    D) The girl who I gave the form to was very nervous. O pronome relativo "who"está correto, pois está se referindo à pessoa. Correta.

    E) It was like a dream from that I feared I would wake sooner or later.  O pronome relativo correto a ser usado é "which", uma vez que se refere a "dream" (sonho) e vem após uma preposição. It was like a dream from which I feared I would wake sooner or later. ( Era como um sonho o qual eu temia acordar mais cedo ou mais tarde. Incorreta.

    Gabarito do Professor: D
  • Mas a letra D não deveria ser WHOM?

    Porquê WHO se refere a sujeito e o termo "a garota", the girl, é objeto

  • não, the girl é sujeito, portanto é who mesmo
  • Lucas, não é não. "girl" é objeto mesmo. Mas eu pesquisei, o WHO foi usado por causa da preposição "to" como eles colocaram a preposiçao no final da sentença relativa o pronome a ser usado deve ser o WHO mesmo. Só seria o WHOM se a sentença fosse The girl to whom I gave the flower was very nervous. Mas a regra diz que se colocar a preposição depois do pronome devemos usar o WHO mesmo que se refira a objeto. Essa explicação tá no site cambridge dictionary

  • É por causa do pronome I

  • fiquei em dúvida, porque o "WHO" não esta sendo usado como sujeito e não pode ser usado como objeto porque está sendo preposicionado

  • Por que a E está incorreta?

  • Ana Clara, A letra E está incorreta porque quando temos o pronome "that" a preposição nunca pode vir antes dele. A preposição só pode aparecer antes do pronome relativo se este for "who", "whom" ou "which"

    Fonte: https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/relative-pronouns-and-relative-clauses

  • A-I saw a girl whO hair was blue. HAIR E UM SUBSTANTIVO, COM SUBSTANTIVO SE USA WHOSE ( CUJO

    )

    B- He got fired again, what surprised everybody. WHAT SO SE USA QUANDO SE REFERINDO A COISA DETERMINADA E NAO A PESSOAS

    C- Mr. Smith, which has never smiled, seems very happy today. WHICH SO SE REFERE A ANIMAIS E COISAS, NAO A PESOA

    E-It was like a dream from that I feared I would wake sooner or later. THAT NAO SE USA NEM COM PREPOSIÇAO E NEM COM VIRGULA

    @LEONARDO_BISPPO, QUALQUER COISA CHAMA NOSSSSSSS

  • no inglês cotidiano o who pode ser usado como objeto se não for precedido de preposição caso tenha preposição seria obrigatório usar o whom


ID
2751289
Banca
FUNDEP (Gestão de Concursos)
Órgão
INB
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

INSTRUCTION: Read the abstract and answer to the question.


 Abstract


Scientists know greenhouse gas emissions cause climate change, but what causes greenhouse gas emissions in the first place? We assessed how many greenhouse gases are released to support the lifestyles of people living in different parts of Europe – in other words, we figured out people’s carbon footprint. We found that different lifestyle choices resulted in very different carbon footprints. In general, people with higher incomes (_____ bought more things and traveled more) had much higher carbon footprints than people ______ lived more modestly.

Understanding how our purchases affect greenhouse gas emissions is an important step to designing policies and guidelines for cutting emissions and addressing climate change.


Available at: <http://www.sciencejournalforkids.org/ uploads/5/4/2/8/54289603/footprint_article.pdf>.

Accessed on: Dec 7th, 2017.

The correct relative pronoun to complete the blanks in the sentence: people with higher incomes (_____ bought more things and traveled more) had much higher carbon footprints than people ______ lived more modestly is:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • O pronome relativo em questão está se referindo a “people” então não pode ser WHICH. E como logo depois do pronome temos um verbo conjugado só pôde-se usar o WHO por se tratar de sujeito
  • c-

    pronome relativos:

    who - pessoas

    that - coisas, animais etc

  • Na verdade, poderia ser usado WHO ou THAT.

    No entanto, usamos who em contextos mais formais e that é usado para contextos informais.

    Nesse caso, ao meu ver poderia admitir os dois pronomes relativos.

    De qualquer forma, só disponibilizaram como alternativa who, então esse é o nosso gabarito, pois:

    Quando o antecedente for pessoa e o pronome relativo exercer a função de sujeito do verbo, deve-se usar who ou that. Fonte: SóLinguaInglesa ( editado)

    Ex.:

    The man who / that talk to you everyday is my brother. ( o homem que fala com você todos os dias é meu irmão).

    Vamos!! É possivel, é so perseverar se esforçar e confiar em Deus!


ID
2856400
Banca
COSEAC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Maricá - RJ
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

TEXT 1 below, retrieved and adapted from https://chroniclingamerica. loc.gov/lccn/sn83035487/1851-06-21/ed-1/seq-4/ on July 9th, 2018.


Text 1 


                    Women’s rights convention – Sojourner Truth


      One of the most unique and interesting speeches of the convention was made by Sojourner Truth, an emancipated slave. It is impossible to transfer it to paper or convey any adequate idea of the effect it produced upon the audience. Those only can appreciate it who saw her powerful form, her whole-souled, earnest gesture, and listened to her strong and truthful tones. She came forward to the platform and addressing the President said with great simplicity:

      "May I say a few words?" Receiving an affirmative answer, she proceeded: I want to say a few words about this matter. I am a woman's rights. I have as much muscle as any man and can do as much work as any man. I have plowed and reaped and husked and chopped and mowed, and can any man do more than that? I have heard much about the sexes being equal. I can carry as much as any man, and can eat as much too, if I can get it. I am as strong as any man that is now. As for intellect, all I can say is, if a woman has a pint, and a man a quart -- why can't she have her little pint full? You need not be afraid to give us our rights for fear we will take too much; -- for we can't take more than our pint will hold. The poor men seem to be all in confusion, and don't know what to do. Why children, if you have woman's rights, give it to her and you will feel better. You will have your own rights, and they won't be so much trouble. I can't read, but I can hear. I have heard the bible and have learned that Eve caused man to sin. Well, if a woman upset the world, do give her a chance to set it right side up again. The Lady has spoken about Jesus, how he never spurned woman from him, and she was right. When Lazarus died, Mary and Martha came to him with faith and love and besought him to raise their brother. And Jesus wept and Lazarus came forth. And how came Jesus into the world? Through God who created him and the woman who bore him. Man, where was your part? But the women are coming up blessed be God and a few of the men are coming up with them. But man is in a tight place, the poor slave is on him, woman is coming on him, he is surely between a hawk and a buzzard.


Reference: Robinson, M. (1851, June 21). Women’s rights convention: Sojourner Truth. Anti-slavery Bugle, vol. 6 no. 41, Page 160.

Question must be answered by looking at the following sentence from Text 1:


“One of the most unique and interesting speeches of the convention was made by Sojourner Truth, an emancipated slave.”


Without any other change added to the sentence, the clause “an emancipated slave” could be preceded by:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • qual o problema da "b"?

  • THAT adiciona uma informação fundamental

  • Não possui duas respostas aceitáveis? "That is" e "Who is"?

  • Quando se referir a pessoa que vai estar exercendo função de sujeito do verbo usa-se o Who/ That

    portanto o gabarito é "E" por causo que o pronome esta sendo usado de forma formalmente na frase referindo ao cara que fez o discurso.

     Pois, em um contexto informal podemos substituir “who” por “that”

    Brasil !

  • Pra quem estiver com dúvida na B (também estava, até parar e prestar mais atenção), o "that" só pode ser utilizado em orações restritivas (ou seja, sem ser isolado por vírgula). Assim:

    "The man I told you about was killed"

    "The man who I told you about was killed"

    "The man that I told you about was killed"

    Quando a oração é separada por vírgulas (ou seja, explicativa), só podemos usar o "who". Por exemplo:

    "Karina, my teacher, told me I did great"

    "Karina, who is my teacher, told me I did great"

    "Karina, that is my teacher, told me I did great" (ERRADO)

    Por isso, na questão, por conta daquela vírgula separando as orações, não podemos usar o "that". Ao menos foi esse o meu entendimento a partir da aulinha da Prof. Joana sobre pronomes relativos, mas, se eu estiver equivocada, por favor, sintam-se à vontade para me corrigir :)


ID
2897647
Banca
INSTITUTO AOCP
Órgão
PM-SC
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

                        From Nail bars to car washes: how big

                             is the UK’s slavery problem?

                                                                                                  by Annie Kelly


      Does slavery exist in the UK?

      More than 250 years since the end of the transatlantic slave trade, there are close to 41 million people still trapped in some form of slavery across the world today. Yet nobody really knows the scale and how many victims or perpetrators of this crime there are in Britain.

      The data that has been released is inconsistent. The government believes there are about 13,000 victims of slavery in the UK, while earlier this year the Global Slavery Index released a much higher estimate of 136,000.

      Statistics on slavery from the National Crime Agency note the number of people passed on to the government’s national referral mechanism (NRM), the process by which victims of slavery are identified and granted statutory support. While this data gives a good snapshot of what kinds of slavery are most prevalent and who is falling victim to exploiters, it doesn’t paint the whole picture. For every victim identified by the police, there will be many others who are not found and remain under the control of traffickers, pimps and gangmasters.

      There are also many potential victims who don’t agree to go through the mechanism because they don’t trust the authorities, or are too scared to report their traffickers. Between 1 November 2015 and 30 June 2018, the government received notifications of 3,306 potential victims of modern slavery in England and Wales who were not referred to the NRM.

      […]

      The police recorded 3,773 modern slavery offences between June 2017 and June 2018.

      […]

(Source: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/ oct/18/nail-bars-car-washes-uk-slavery-problem-anti-slavery-day. Access: 20/10/2018)

Mark the option which Best describes the word “Who” as it appears in sentences like “There are also many potential victims who don’t agree to go through the mechanism (…)”.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • opção E

    It is a relative pronoun which works as the subject of the verb following it and refers back to a person or persons.

  • Who - Pronome relativo (que ou quem) usado para pessoas.

    GAB E

  • Bizu(prep + who (não pode)

  • A questão cobra conhecimento gramatical, especificamente sobre pronomes relativos.

    Vamos analisar o enunciado:

    Mark the option which Best describes the word “Who" as it appears in sentences like “There are also many potential victims who don't agree to go through the mechanism (…)".
    Tradução - Marque a opção que melhor descreve a palavra "Que", conforme aparece em frases como "Existem também muitas vítimas em potencial que não concordam em passar pelo mecanismo (...)".


    O pronome "que" no trecho acima é um pronome relativo e se refere às vítimas em potencial, funcionando assim como sujeito do verbo que se segue, o verbo concordar.
    Analisando as alternativas teremos:

    A) Incorreto - It is an interrogative pronoun which points out to the person which has done the action.
    Tradução - É um pronome interrogativo que aponta para a pessoa que fez a ação.
    É um pronome relativo.

    B) Incorreto - It is a reflexive pronoun which works as the direct or indirect object of the verb.
    Tradução - É um pronome reflexivo que funciona como o objeto direto ou indireto do verbo.
    É um pronome relativo.

    C) Incorreto - It is a possessive pronoun which is used to indicate the one or ones belonging to the person it refers back to.
    Tradução - É um pronome possessivo usado para indicar aquele ou aqueles pertencentes à pessoa a que se refere.
    É um pronome relativo.

    D) Incorreto - It is an object pronoun which is used as the direct or indirect object of the verb that comes before it.
    Tradução - É um pronome objeto que é usado como o objeto direto ou indireto do verbo que o precede.
    É um pronome relativo.

    E) Correto - It is a relative pronoun which works as the subject of the verb following it and refers back to a person or persons. 
    Tradução - É um pronome relativo que funciona como sujeito do verbo que o segue e se refere a uma pessoa ou pessoas.


    Gabarito do Professor: Letra E.


ID
2991745
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Read the text to answer question.

The cabin crew battled to save the passenger 

Ben Graham

     Shocked passengers watched as doctors and cabin crew tried to save the life of a critically ill passenger on a Qantas flight to Sidney on Friday. 
    A Qantas spokeswoman confirmed that the passenger ________ received tratment during the medical emergency couldn’t survive. 
   The flight from London, via Singapore, was forced to land in Adelaide because of the incident. No passengers got off the flight while it was in Adelaide.
    A witness on board told that everything started with a cabin announcement asking for any doctors on board. There were two passengers with medical training, but nothing could be done to save the passenger. The crew did everything they could, including performing CPR with a doctor on board, but unfortunately the passenger has passed away.

Adapted from nypost.com

Fill in the blank with the correct relative pronoun.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Letra A. who- da uma ideia de "que"

    Uma porta-voz da Qantas confirmou que o passageiro que recebeu tratamento durante a emergência médica não conseguiu sobreviver. ( traduzindo aquela parte do texto, ficaria assim)

  • Preencha o espaço em branco com o pronome relativo correto.
    A) Who - quem, que - é usado para pessoas - relativo a pessoas. There is a man outside who wants to see you. (Há um homem lá fora que quer falar com você).
    B) What - o que - pode exercer função de sujeito ou objeto. - I don't know what happened yesterday. (Não sei o que aconteceu ontem.)
    C)  Which - que, o qual, o que - relativo a coisas e animais. This is the bus which I take to go home. (Este é o ônibus que eu pego para ir para casa). This is the cat which got in trouble yesterday. (Este é o gato que entrou numa fria ontem).
    D)  Whose - cujo, cuja, cujos, cujas - relativo à posse, é usado para pessoas e animais. That's the woman whose son is living abroad. ( Aquela é a mulher cujo filho está morando em outro país.)
    No texto, o pronome relativo que preenche corretamente o espaço é "who", uma vez que estamos nos referindo ao passageiro (passenger).
     A Qantas spokeswoman confirmed that the passenger who received treatment during the medical emergency couldn't survive. 
     Tradução: Uma porta-voz da Qantas confirmou que o passageiro que recebeu tratamento durante a emergência médica não conseguiu sobreviver.
    Gabarito do Professor: A
  • Ae rapazia, isso nada mais é do que um pronome relativo, retoma alguém citado anteriormente.

    Logo, ele tem alguns detalhes, como se o que está sendo referido é uma pessoa, vamos utilizar WHO, como é o caso descrito na questão.

  • Uma porta-voz do Qantas confirmou que o passageiro que recebeu tratamento durante a emergência médica não sobreviveu.

    o pronome relativo está se referindo ao passageiro que recebeu o tratamento.

    WHO é usado para se referir a sujeito e objeto (PESSOAS) não preposicionado.---(ALTERNATIVA CORRETA)

    Para saber se WHAT pode ser usado, é só substituir por "as coisas que", que no caso do texto não se encaixaria.

    WHICH é usado quando se refere a coisas e animais. O pronome relativo da frase refere-se a uma pessoa.

    WHOSE é o único utilizado para indicar posse. O pronome relativo usado na frase não da ideia de posse.

  • WHO se refere a uma pessoa que executa a ação da oração

    WHOM é utilizado quando se trata de alguém que recebe uma ação. 

    No caso da questão, usa-se oo who porque refere-se aos passageiros que executaram a ação de reservar o tratamento médico


ID
3019033
Banca
NUCEPE
Órgão
Prefeitura de Teresina - PI
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Smiling Can Actually Make People Happier, Study Finds

Researchers of a new study find that the simple act (1)______ smiling can actually make a person happier. Evidently, nearly 50 years of data shows facial expressions can affect an individual’s emotions or feelings.

Emotional Debate  

For over 100 years, psychologists have been debating whether facial expressions can affect emotions. The argument became even more pronounced (2)______ 2016 after 17 teams of scientists failed to replicate a popular experiment that would supposedly show that smiling can actually make people happier. 

While there are some studies that do not show a relationship (3)______facial expressions and emotional feelings, the researchers of the new study believe that they can’t focus on the data from just one. As such, they scoured data from 138 studies, which tested over 11,000 participants (4)_____ all over the world. 

“But we can’t focus on the results of any one study. Psychologists have been testing this idea since the early 1970s, so we wanted to look at all the evidence,” said lead researcher Nicholas Coles, PhD. 

Facial Expressions Affect People's Emotions 

Based on the team’s meta-analysis, facial expressions do, in fact, have a small impact on emotions. For instance, a person who smiles will feel happier, a person who scowls will feel angrier, and a person who frowns will feel sadder. While the effects aren’t very powerful or long-lasting, it is significant enough to show a correlation.  

According to researchers, their findings bring us closer to understanding how human emotions work and how the mind and body work together to shape how we experience emotions. That said, they do note that they are not saying that people can just smile their way to happiness, especially when it comes to mental health conditions such as depression. 

The study is published in Psychological Bulletin. 

Source: https://www.techtimes.com/articles/241396/20190413/smiling-can-actually-make-peoplehappier-study-finds.htm(adapted)Access: April 13th, 2019 

In the sentence “For instance, a person who smiles will feel happier, a person who scowls will feel angrier, and a person who frowns will feel sadder.” the relative pronoun used in it can be replaced by

Alternativas
Comentários
  • O uso do THAT se justifica porque o termo em questão pode ter como seu referente pessoa ou coisa e não está precedido de vírgula.

  • Gabarito: D

    The relative pronoun "that" can be used on several different occasions, both with people and with animals and objects.


ID
3222688
Banca
FURB
Órgão
Prefeitura de Blumenau - SC
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

What is the sequence that presents the correct example assessment items with their grammatical focus listed below?

Grammatical focus:
A superlative
B past simple
C gerunds and infinitives
D relative pronouns
E present simple passive
F second conditional

Example assessment items:
1) Complete the sentences with the correct word(s).
I .......... there for six years before moving to Budapest.
2) Complete the descriptions with who or which.
This is a kind of cheese .......... is made from goat’s milk not cow’s milk.
3) Rewrite the sentences using the correct form of the verbs in brackets.
Where (you/fly) if (you/be) a bird?
4) Complete the sentences with the correct form of the verbs in brackets.
Coffee (grow) in Brazil. It (export) to many countries in the world.
5) Complete the sentences with ... +ing or to + ... .
I decided (send) a letter to my friend.
6) Complete the sentences with an appropriate adjective.
Shanghai is the .......... city in the world.

Mark the alternative that presents the correct sequence:

Alternativas

ID
3328507
Banca
FUNDEP (Gestão de Concursos)
Órgão
Prefeitura de Ibirité - MG
Ano
2016
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

INSTRUCTIONS: Read the following text and answer question.

It has been estimated that some 60 percent of today’sworld population is multilingual. Both from a contemporary and a historical perspective, bilingualism or multilingualism is the norm rather than the exception. It is fair, then, to say that throughout history foreign language learning has always been an important practical concern. Whereas today English is the world’s most widely studied foreign language, five hundred years ago it was Latin, for it was the dominant language of education, commerce, religion, and government in the Western world. In the sixteenth century, however, French, Italian, and English gained in importance as a result of political changes in Europe, and Latin gradually became displaced as a language of spoken and written communication.

As the status of Latin diminished from that of a living language to that of an “occasional” subject in the school curriculum, the study of Latin took on a different function. The study of classical Latin (the Latin in which the classical works of Virgil, Ovid, and Cicero were written) and an analysis of its grammar and rhetoric became the model for foreign language study from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries. Children entering “grammar school” in the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries in England were initially given a rigorous introduction to Latin grammar, which was taught through rote learning of grammar rules, study of declensions and conjugations, translation, and practice in writing sample sentences, sometimes with the use of parallel bilingual texts and dialogue (Kelly 1969; Howatt 1984). Once basic proficiency was established, students were introduced to the advanced study of grammar and rhetoric. School learning must have been a deadening experience for children, for lapses in knowledge were often met with brutal punishment. There were occasional attempts to promote alternative approaches to education; Roger Ascham and Montaigne in the sixteenth century and Comenius and John Locke in the seventeenth century, for example, had made specific proposals for curriculum reform and for changes in the way Latin was taught (Kelly 1969; Howatt 1984), but since Latin (and, to a lesser extent, Greek) had for so long been regarded as the classical and therefore most ideal form of language, it was not surprising that ideas about the role of language study in the curriculum reflected the long-established status of Latin.

The decline of Latin also brought with it a new justification for teaching Latin. Latin was said to develop intellectual abilities, and the study of Latin grammar became an end in itself.

Source: RICHARDS, J.C.; RODGERS, T. S. Approaches

and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, 1999 (1st edition 1986). pp. 1-2.

Analyze the following sentence from the text:

Children entering “grammar school” in the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries in England were initially given a rigorous introduction to Latin grammar, which was taught through rote learning of grammar rules, study of declensions and conjugations, translation, and practice in writing sample sentences, sometimes with the use of parallel bilingual texts and dialogue (Kelly 1969; Howatt 1984).

In this example, the word “which” is a relative pronoun. It links a noun phrase to a relative clause. Choose the following alternative that presents the noun phrase linked by “which” to a relative clause.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • as crianças que ingressaram na escola de gramatica da Inglaterra receberam inicialmente uma introdução rigorosa à gramatica latina , ensinada através do aprendizado de regras de gramatica ( latin grammar )


ID
3331156
Banca
IBFC
Órgão
SEDUC-MT
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

From question 53 to 63, choose the CORRECT answers to fll in the blanks.

São Paulo, the largest city in Brazil, has many touristic attractions, including museums of art _________ visitors from the entire country all year round.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • teríamos que usar o pronome relativo.

    Museums está no plural, logo, eliminaria as que possuem os verbos conjugado na segunda pessoa.

    Tem uma pegadinha boa> which pode ser substituído por that, mas o verbo conjugado elimina a C, restando a D


ID
3745534
Banca
FUNCERN
Órgão
Consórcio do Trairí - RN
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Nazi labor camp guard living in New York deported

to Germany

 

By Sheena McKenzie, CNN Updated 2155 GMT (0555 HKT) August 21, 2018



             (CNN) A former Nazi labor camp guard who has been living in the United States for decades has finally been deported to Germany after years of diplomatic wrangling, the White House announced on Tuesday. Jakiw Palij, who worked as a guard at the Trawniki Labor Camp, in what was then German-occupied Poland, had been living out his post-war years in Queens, New York City.

            Palij, 95, was born in what was then-Poland and now Ukraine, and immigrated to the US in 1949, becoming a citizen in 1957. The former Nazi guard lied to US immigration officials about his role in World War II, saying he worked on a farm and in a factory, the White House said in a statement. In 2001, Palij admitted to US Department of Justice officials that he had in fact trained and worked at the Trawniki Labor Camp in 1943. On November 3, 1943, around 6,000 Jewish prisoners at the camp were shot to death in one of the single largest massacres of the Holocaust, according to the White House statement.

        "By serving as an armed guard at the Trawniki Labor Camp and preventing the escape of Jewish prisoners during his Nazi service, Palij played an indispensable role in ensuring that the Trawniki Jewish victims met their horrific fate at the hands of the Nazis," the White House added. In court filings, Palij has denied wrongdoing, claiming that he and other young men in his Polish hometown were coerced into working for the Nazi occupiers. In 2003, Palij's US citizenship was revoked. The following year, a federal judge ordered that Palij be deported -- but none of the European countries to which he could have been sent, would take him.

         […]Attorney General Jeff Sessions praised the work of the Justice Department's best-known Nazi hunter, Eli Rosenbaum, and his team in successfully removing the 68th Nazi from the United States. Palij's case represents the closing of an era -- until now he was the only remaining active case from the Nazi era pursued by the Justice Department's Office of Human Rights and Special Prosecutions.

          The atrocities of the Trawniki camp, where Palij worked, aren't well known in part because the killing was thorough, historians say. One document researchers uncovered helped illustrate the extent of the killing. A soldier broke the butt of his rifle, which meant he was required to file a report so the German SS would issue him a new one. The report mentioned an operation that killed 4,000 people at Trawniki, mostly Jews.



Available at: <https://edition.cnn.com/2018/08/21/politics/nazijakiw-palij-deported-germany-intl/index.html>.

The element he in the paragraph before the last refers to

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Gab. A...

    se o trecho ao qual ele faz referencia for este:

    "In 2001, Palij admitted to US Department of Justice officials that he had in fact trained and worked at the Trawniki Labor Camp in 1943." 

    a tradução seria mais ou menos esta: Palij admitiu aos oficiais do departamento que ELE havia de fato treinado e trabalhado.

    ELE faz referencia a PALIJ.

    Alguém com um inglês melhor pode comentar?


ID
3790135
Banca
PUC - SP
Órgão
PUC - SP
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

No excerto do sexto parágrafo “whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater”, a palavra it se refere a

Alternativas

ID
3798517
Banca
FATEC
Órgão
FATEC
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Leia o texto para responder a questão.

Here’s how long you can work before your brain 1shuts down

    I’m having a hard time starting this article. According to research out of the University of Melbourne, that might be because I’m middle-aged and work too much. Economists determined that burning the midnight oil makes you, well, dumber.” Our study highlights that too much work can have adverse effects on cognitive functioning,” they conclude.
    Tell us something we didn’t know. Who hasn’t, at the end of a seemingly endless workweek, found themselves staring blankly at their computer screen or into space unable to remember what they had for lunch, let alone form a coherent thought about the task at hand?
      For some employees, of course – the average resident 2 physician or, these days, that “3 gig economy” worker who makes ends meet by banging away at multiple projects – long hours are a fact of modern working life. And there’s a cost. Medical researchers have shown that working too much can affect employees’ physical and mental health.
      So how much is too much? For people age 40 and older, working up to roughly 25 hours per week boosts memory, the ability to quickly process information and other aspects of cognitive function, according to the study, which drew on a longitudinal survey that tracks the well-being of 6,000 Australians. Beyond 25 hours a week, the middle-aged brain doesn’t work as well, the study indicates, noting that the findings apply to both men and women.
<http://tinyurl.com/j4os8ck> Acesso em: 24.08.2016. Adaptado.

Glossário
1to shut down: parar de operar/funcionar.
2physician: médico.
3gig economy: ambiente de trabalho baseado em empregos temporários e contratos de curta duração.

O pronome relativo that, em “that tracks the well-being of 6,000 Australians”, pode ser corretamente substituído, sem alteração do sentido original, por

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Gabarito (E)

    O pronome relativo that pode substituir os pronomes who ou which. Porém, isso só pode acontecer quando o termo que sucede o pronome relativo fizer função de sujeito e NÃO estiver entre vírgulas.

    Bons estudos!


ID
4010194
Banca
FEPESE
Órgão
ABEPRO
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Text

Operations management is important. It is concerned with creating the products and services upon which we all depend. And creating products and services is the very reason for any organization’s existence, whether that organization be large or small, manufacturing or service, for profit or not profit. Thankfully, most companies have now come to understand the importance of operations. This is because they have realized that effective operations management gives the potential to improve revenues and, at the same time, enables goods and services to be produced more efficiently. It is this combination of higher revenues and lower costs which is understandably important to any organization.

Operations management is also exciting. It is at the center of so many of the changes affecting the business world – changes in customer preference, changes in supply networks brought about by internet-based technologies, changes in what we want to do at work, how we want to work, and so on. There has rarely been a time when operations management was more topical or more at the heart of business and cultural shifts.

Operations management is also challenging. Promoting the creativity which will allow organizations to respond to so many changes is becoming the prime task of operations managers. It is they who must find the solutions to technological and environmental challenges, the pressures to be socially responsible, the increasing globalization of markets and the difficult-to-define areas of knowledge management.

The underlined word in: “It is they who must find the solutions to technological and…” is being used as a:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Os pronomes relativos em inglês são:

    Who

    Whom

    Whose

    Which

    Where

    When

    That

    What

  • WHO = " QUE " ( sujeito) ; pode ser substituído por THAT

    • usado quando o pronome referir-se às pessoas.

    ex:

    The girl WHO is playing is coutry.

    APMBB

  • Pronomes relativos

     

    Who= quem, o qual

     

    Whose= cujo, cuja que relaciona dois substantivos com sentido de posse

     

    Which= o qual, que

     

    Where= onde, em que

     

    When= quando, no qual

     

    That= que

     

    What= o que

    PRONOME RELATIVO THAT:  that substitui whowhom e which em orações restritivas e sem preposição

    "Eu gosto do impossível, porque lá a concorrência é menor." - Walt Disney


ID
4130344
Banca
ULBRA
Órgão
ULBRA
Ano
2011
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

    As we all know, electricity is a fundamental need. On a daily basis, we consume electricity even without us knowing it. Just a simple task such as listening to your music player consumes electricity. Today, most of our electric generators and power plants are fed with fossil fuels such as petroleum and coal. However, due to the exponential increase of power demand, fossil fuel supplies are slowly being depleted. Not only that, but also burning fossil fuels has given off greenhouse gases and other unwanted byproducts. Because of this, the search for alternative energy sources is now a necessity. One of the most promising alternative energy sources today is Wind Powered Generators. So, what is a wind-powered generator? Basically it is the use of wind as a mechanical force needed to power an electric generator. Utilizing wind as an energy source is not exactly a new idea. The ancient Persians were the first to use wind to pump water, cut wood, and grind food and others by building windmills. Even today you can find windmills still being used on some farms. It was the use of wind as an electric source that came into existence much later. The first practical wind powered generators were built in 1970, but yet we rarely see them in widespread use today, why? Let’s look at the advantages and disadvantages of the wind powered generator.
    The main advantage of wind powered generators is that they have, ideally, zero gas emissions – unlike fossil-fueled power generators. Because of the alarming effects of greenhouse gases and global warming, we want our power generators to be as clean and as environmentally friendly as possible. Since there is no burning process in a wind powered generator that produces toxic gases, it is very safe to build one in residential areas. Also, with proper engineering and enough wind, these generators can provide a high rate of wattage that can go as high as the Megawatt range. Another advantage is that it can be implemented using several small turbines connected together. This is a good thing when there is not enough space for huge structures.
     The major disadvantage of wind powered generators is that wind power varies greatly from one place to another and from day to day and season to season. Sometimes wind may be strong enough to supply energy, but that strength cannot be maintained due to changes in weather patterns. Needing strong, constant wind to most effectively power wind generators is one reason they are often built in coastal areas. Another disadvantage is that the structure of most practical wind powered generators is huge and bulky. Commonly, its size is proportional to the wind power it can collect.
    Research in wind power has now intensified because of its innate advantages over other power generators. With this increase in interest in wind energy and alternative energy sources as a whole, our future will become brighter and more and more remote areas will eventually enjoy the benefits of clean electric energy. In an electricity-dependent world, power supplies must provide the required electricity for communities and businesses. Wind powered generators might just be the solution for power shortages.

Disponível em: http://mysolarcellhome.org/articles/pros-and-cons-of-wind-powered-generators. 

All the statements below, with the exception of one, make use of "that" as a relative pronoun or a conjunction. Select THE EXCEPTION.

Alternativas

ID
4840801
Banca
Exército
Órgão
EsFCEx
Ano
2020
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Read the text below and answer the question.


Thought-in-Action Links


    It is important to recognize that methods link thoughts and actions, because teaching is not entirely about one or the other. As a teacher of language, you have thoughts about your subject matter – what language is, what culture is – and about your students – who they are as learners and how it is they learn. You also have thoughts about yourself as a teacher and what you can do to help your students to learn. Many of your thoughts have been formed by your own experience as a language learner. With this awareness, you are able to examine why you do what you do and perhaps choose to think about or do things differently.

    As an example, let us relate an anecdote about a teacher with whom Diane Larsen-Freeman was working some time ago. From her study of methods in Stevick (1980), Heather (not her real name) became interested in how to work with teacher control and student initiative in her teaching. She determined that during her student teaching internship, she would exercise less control of the lesson in order to encourage her students to take more initiative, and have them impose the questions in the classroom, since so often it is the teacher who asks all the questions, not the students.

    However, she felt that the students were not taking the initiative, but she could not see what was wrong. When Diane Larsen Freeman, who was her supervisor, visited her class, she observed the following:

    HEATHER: Juan, ask Anna what she is wearing.

    JÜAN: What are you wearing?

    ANNA: I am wearing a dress.

    HEATHER: Anna, ask Muriel what she is writing.

    ANNA: What are you writing?

    MÜRIEL: I am writing a letter.

    This pattern continued for some time. It was clear to see that Heather had successfully avoided the common problem of the teacher asking all the questions in the class. The teacher was not asking the questions – the students were. However, Heather had not achieved her goal of encouraging student initiative.

(Larsen-Freeman, D. 2000. Adaptado)

The fragment from the last paragraph “who was her supervisor” is an example of an adjective clause. Mark the alternative in which the deletion of the relative pronoun (and only the relative pronoun) is possible.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • O pronome relativo corresponde a : Where--> onde, em que, no que, no qual, na qual, nos quais, nas quais

  • B

  • O pronomes relativo pode ser omitido quando se referir a algo com função de OBJETO

  • os pronomes relativos podem ser omitidos quando o que vem antes e depois dele são coisas, pessoas diferentes ou coisa +PR+pessoa!!
  • RESUMINHO SOBRE USOS DE PRONOME NO INGLES: na verdade, o pronome relativo pode ser omitido somente se não houver verbo sucedendo ele, ou seja, se o pronome é antecedido de pessoa ou não, não interfere em sua omissão. A única coisa que vai mudar, se houver objeto antes é o uso de which ou that, ou omiti-los ( se nao estiver sendo sucedido por verbo ), no entanto, se houver pessoa antes do pronome relativo, usa-se who, that, whom, ou nada ( se não estiver sendo sucedido por verbo ). Agora, se estiver sendo sucedido por verbo, poderão ser usados somente: which ou that ( quando estiver se referindo a animais ou objetos ), ou who ou that ( quando estiver se referindo a pessoa ). Há também uma variação de pronomes relativos, quando o pronome relativo vier em um aposto ( frase em que há uma parte entre vírgulas no meio da frase, com a finalidade de especificar, como ocorre no português ), sendo usado nessa variação: whom usado quando o sujeito o sucede no aposto, ou who quando não houver sujeito o sucedendo. EX: the boy, WHO is my neighbor, works downtown- não tem sujeito o sucedendo; outro exemplo: the boy, WHOM she neighbor, works downtown- tem sujeito sucedendo o pronome relativo. ESPERO TER AJUDADO

  • Lembrando que "Where" não é um pronome relativo e sim um advérbio de lugar.

  • É possível emitir se não existir uma preposição antes e não existir um verbo depois.

    Obs: Não é possível omitir o WHOSE

  • Para que o pronome relativo possa ser omitido, esse tem que realizar a função de objeto:

    We enjoyed the place where we spent our vacation.

    Nós aproveitamos o lugar onde nós passamos nossas férias.

    Quem passou? Nós. Onde nós passamos? the place. Função de objeto!


ID
4863514
Banca
GUALIMP
Órgão
Prefeitura de Areal - RJ
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Complete the sentence below with the relative clause. Choose the CORRECT answer.

“Martin Luther King was the politician _________ speech changed the world forever.”

Alternativas
Comentários
  • “Martin Luther King was the politician WHOSE speech changed the world forever.”

    WHOSE = PRONOME RELATIVO SIGNIFICA -> CUJO que relaciona dois substântivos com sentido de posse ( Martin Luther king e o seu speech=discurso)

    logo GAB ALFA

    FATIOU CORTOU !

  • PRONOMES RELATIVOS

    WHO= QUEM, O QUAL

    WHOSE= CUJO, CUJA

    WHICH= O QUAL, QUE

    WHERE= ONDE, EM QUE

    WHEN= QUANDO, NO QUAL

    THAT= QUE

    WHAT= O QUE


ID
4875079
Banca
FURB
Órgão
Prefeitura de Porto Belo - SC
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

About the use of relative clauses, read the sentences that follow:

I- The woman who lives next door is a doctor.
II- Everything what happened was my fault.
III- The machine that broke down is now working again.
IV- I don’t like stories that have unhappy endings.
V- Where is the cheese which was in the fridge?

Choose the alternative with the correct answer:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • What é usado só para perguntas eu acho

  •  Everything what happened was my fault.

    what pode ser usado como pronome relativo e interrogativo

    mas na frase só caberia o pronome relativo "that=que" dandp melhor coesão e por isso o erro da questão.

    FATIOU CORTOU!!

    GAB CHARLIE


ID
4975354
Banca
Exército
Órgão
EsPCEx
Ano
2020
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

OXFAM AMERICA


    Oxfam stands for the Oxford Committee for Famine Relief. It was started in Oxford, England in 1942 in response to the European famine-related issues resulting from the Second World War. Ten other countries worldwide, including the United States and Australia, have started chapters of Oxfam. They make up what is known as Oxfam International.

    Oxfam America is dedicated to creating lasting solutions to hunger, poverty, and social injustice through long-term partnerships with poor communities around the world. As a privately funded organization, we can speak with conviction and integrity as we challenge the structural barriers that foster conflict and human suffering and limit people from gaining the skills, resources, and power to become self-sufficient.

    Oxfam implements various global projects that target areas particularly affected by hunger. The projects focus on developing self-sufficiency of the communities in which they are based, as opposed to merely providing relief in the form of food aid. Oxfam’s projects operate on the communal level, and are developed by evaluating issues causing poverty and hunger in the community and subsequently the possible infrastructure that could end hunger and foster the attainment of self-sufficiency. Examples of projects in which Oxfam America has been or is involved range from a women’s literacy program in India to providing microloans and agriculture education programs for small-scale organic farmers in California.

Adapted from http://students.brown.edu/Hourglass_Cafe/Pages/about.htm

In the sentence “The projects focus on developing self-sufficiency of the communities in which they are based.” (paragraph 3), the words in which and they consecutively refer to

Alternativas
Comentários
  • vamos fazer por eliminação

    Pegue o último trecho após o pronome they "are based..." Pergunte pra você mesmo quem são baseados? Automaticamente você responderá os projetcs, porque não tem como a comunidade ser baseada não fica muito com sentido igual fica com projects, logo elimine as assertivas B,C e D.

    Após isso, você tem que perceber que o Which ele fala quem é baseados por esses projects que no caso é a comunidade e não a Oxfam, com isso matei a questão.

    Foi assim que acertei caso não seja a forma correta, corriga!!

  • which funcionando como pronome relativo

  • Na frase “Os projetos têm como foco o desenvolvimento da autossuficiência das comunidades nas quais (eles) estão inseridos".(parágrafo 3), as palavras in which e they se referem consecutivamente a

    A) Oxfam e os projetos.
    B) os projetos e a ajuda alimentar.
    C) as comunidades e a ajuda alimentar.
    D) autossuficiência e as comunidades.
    E) as comunidades e os projetos.

    "in which" (nas quais), se refere às comunidades.
    "they" (eles) se referem aos projetos inseridos nas comunidades.

    Gabarito do Professor: Letra E.




  • E)

    WHICH:

    → Relativo (que, o que, o qual, os quais)

    "in which" (nas quais), se refere às comunidades.

    "they" (eles) se referem aos projetos inseridos nas comunidades.

  • concordo plenamente

  • O PRONOME RELATIVO É COLCADO LOGO APÓS O SEU ANTECEDENTE

  • Na frase “Os projetos têm como foco o desenvolvimento da autossuficiência das comunidades em que estão inseridos”. (parágrafo 3), as palavras em que estão se referem consecutivamente a

    [A] Oxfam e os projetos.

    [B] os projetos e ajuda alimentar.

    [C] as comunidades e a ajuda alimentar.

    [D] autossuficiência e as comunidades.

    [E] as comunidades e os projetos. (As comunidades que estão inseridas nos projetos)

    youtube.com/professorthiagoenglish

  • seguinte, sabendo que antes de "which they" você pode entender que o sujeito de quem eles estão falando são projects e communities.


ID
4979623
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2020
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Corruption


    People all over the world complain about the corruption of police, government officials, and business leader. Three examples of corruption are:

    • a police officer takes money from a driver so he doesn’t give the driver a ticket for speeding.

    • a public official gives a government contract to a company in which he, or she has a financial interest.

    • a company that wants to do business with a government agency offers public official money, or a gift to choose that company for the job.

    Some people feel that power promotes corruption and that corruption is just an unavoidable part of human nature. But everyone agrees that it’s a terrible problem all over the world.

Adapted from Top Noch.

According to the text, the underlined word “which” is a_____________.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Which means, in portuguese, "o/a qual" or "qual" Itis a relative pronoun


ID
4980352
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

The idea of evolution (which is gradual change) was not a new one. The Greeks had thought of it, so Erasmus Darwin, the grandfather of Charles, and also the Frenchman, Lamarck. It is one thing to have an idea; we can all of us guess and sometimes make a lucky guess.  

The pronoun one, in bold in the text, refers to:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • (D)

    The idea of evolution (which is gradual change) was not a new one.

    Tradução--> A ideia de evolução (que é uma mudança gradual) não era nova.

  • Sempre que tiver algum "its " " it " ou "one " e pedirem para você ver a qual palavra ele se refere, vai pelas pontuações, geralmente para se referir a algo ou você se refere na mesma oração ou você coloca uma virgula, conjunção ou ponto final. ( Isso não entrega a questão, mas facilita. )

  • O que não era nova? a ideia de evolução

  • One poder ser utilizado como numeral ou,dependendo do contexto,como um pronome demonstratativo ou como uma forma de retornar um item citado anteriormente.Traduzindo

    "A ideia de revolução(A qual é uma mudança gradual) não é uma novidade"Nota-se que uma refere-se A ideia de revolução.Logo ,a "One" refere-se "Ideia of Revolution"


ID
4980355
Banca
Aeronáutica
Órgão
EEAR
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

The idea of evolution (which is gradual change) was not a new one. The Greeks had thought of it, so Erasmus Darwin, the grandfather of Charles, and also the Frenchman, Lamarck. It is one thing to have an idea; we can all of us guess and sometimes make a lucky guess.  

The pronoun one, in the text, is classified as:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • O gabarito está errado! A resposta correta é letra C.

  • Letra "C" é a alternativa correta, pois o pronome indefinido é usado para substituir o substantivo, nesse caso o que não era nova, era a ideia da evolução.

  • Ué, não seria a alternativa C)?

  • The idea of evolution (which is gradual change) was not a new one. The Greeks had thought of it, so Erasmus Darwin, the grandfather of Charles, and also the Frenchman, Lamarck. It is one thing to have an idea; we can all of us guess and sometimes make a lucky guess.  

    The pronoun one, in the text, is classified as:

    (A) object pronoun ERRADA

    • Os Pronomes Objetos (Object Pronouns) substituem os objetos diretos ou indiretos
    • Me, You, Him, Her, It, Us, You, Them

    (B) relative pronoun CERTA

    • Refere-se a um sujeito anterior na oração

    (C) indefinite pronoun ERRADA

    • Os pronomes indefinidos em inglês (indefinite pronouns) são aqueles que substituem ou acompanham o substantivo de maneira imprecisa ou indeterminada. 
    • Few e little

    (D) possessive pronoun ERRADA

    • Os Pronomes Possessivos (Possessive Pronouns) são usados com o intuito de substituir o substantivo
    • Mine, Yours, His, Hers, Its, Ours, Yours, Theirs

    GAB. B


ID
5128714
Banca
AGIRH
Órgão
Prefeitura de Roseira - SP
Ano
2020
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Complete the sentence with the correct answer.

The man was talking with that girl _________ is wearing a white shirt.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Gabarito (B)

    O pronome mais indicado para esse caso é o "que". No inglês ele pode aparecer de três formas: who, which ou that. O who só pode ser utilizado quando o referente é uma pessoa, o which é utilizado quando o referente é uma coisa/objeto. Já o that pode ser utilizado com os dois tipos de referentes (pessoas ou coisas/objetos).

    "The man was talking with that girl who is wearing a white shirt."

    Tradução: O homem estava conversando com aquela garota que está vestindo uma camiseta branca.

    Bons estudos!


ID
5129941
Banca
IBADE
Órgão
SEE-AC
Ano
2020
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

TEXT 

REFERS TO QUESTION


The Literary Influences of Superstar Musician David Bowie

BY JOHN O'CONNELL ON 10/31/19 AT 5:00 AM EDT

David Bowie was a pop star for most of his career from the 1960s until his death in 2016. He was known for his flamboyant style, songwriting and the ability to artistically turn on a dime. But Bowie, who died of cancer at 69, was more than a multi-platinum rock and roller. He was also one of the more literate composers in the business.

So much so, in fact, that in conjunction with a career retrospective in 2013 at the Victoria & Albert Museum in London, Bowie issued a list of the one hundred books he considered the most important and influential. British music columnist John O'Connell linked this list to Bowie's prolific music. The result? A book called Bowie's Bookshelf out this month from Gallery Books.

William S. Burroughs first made the link between Bowie's lyrics and T. S. Eliot's poetry. In a Rolling Stone interview, Burroughs asked if Hunky Dory's "Eight Line Poem" had been influenced by Eliot's "The Hollow Men." Bowie's reply: "Never read him." But Bowie was definitely exposed to Eliot's influence. "Goodnight Ladies" on Transformer, the album Bowie produced for Lou Reed in 1972, is a riff on the end of the second section, "A Game of Chess," from Eliot's poem "The Waste Land." Eliot, for his part, is deliberately quoting Ophelia's "Good night, sweet ladies" speech from Hamlet. Eliot's method established a new protocol for artistic theft—the modern poet in dialogue with his or her predecessors. Bowie, too, was candid about how much he took from other artists. "You can't steal from a thief," he said when LCD Soundsystem's James Murphy admitted to stealing from Bowie's songs.

Avaiable in : https://www.newsweek.com/2019/11/15, accessed on February 20th, 2020. Adapted. 

The word WHO in “But Bowie, who died of cancer at 69, was more than a multi-platinum rock and roller” is:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • The word WHO in “But Bowie, who died of...” is:

    A palavra QUEM em “Mas Bowie, quem morreu de...” é:

    .

    D) Pronoun

    Pronome

    .

    It is a Relative Pronoun, which is used to refer to nouns mentioned previously.

    É um Pronome Relativo, que é usado para se referir a palavras mencionadas anteriormente.

    Ela retorna a palavra Bowie

    .

    Gabarito: Letra D


ID
5154640
Banca
Unoesc
Órgão
Prefeitura de Maravilha - SC
Ano
2021
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Analyze the sentence below.


“I meet a woman that can speak six languages.”

The relative pronoun “that” can be replaced by:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Pq n a A tb.?

  • Essa frase não faz muito sentido do jeito que está escrita, deveria estar no passado: I met a woman...

  • GABARITO B

    We can use the relative pronouns WHO and THAT to refer to a person. (Podemos usar os pronomes relativos WHO e THAT para se referir a uma pessoa). Neste caso, ambos podem ser utilizados para fornecer uma informação sobre alguém. Portanto, o WHO não desempenha o papel de subject (sujeito) desta vez, como já explicamos por aqui.

    Let's see some examples:

    • Brian is the doctor who/that saved your life. - Brian é o médico que salvou sua vida.
    • Lucas is the boy who/that invited Amanda to the party. - Lucas é o garoto que convidou Amanda para a festa.
    • Samantha was the artist who/that painted this wall. - Samantha foi a artista que pintou este muro.
    • Isn’t that the boy who/that traveled to Canada last year? - Não é o garoto que viajou para o Canadá no ano passado?
    • Is Laura the lucky woman who/that won in the lottery? - Laura é a mulher de sorte que ganhou na loteria?

    Portanto, quando seguido por um verbo, pode-se utilizar tanto o WHO quanto o THAT para se referir à uma pessoa, em uma determinada situação.

    • Gina is the new teacher who/that Jean met at school yesterday. - Gina é a nova professora que Jean conheceu na escola ontem.
    • Ana is the girl who/that Julia helped to pass in math. - Ana é a garota que Julia ajudou a passar em matemática.
    • They are the guys who/that we met at the party last night. - Eles são os caras que conhecemos na festa noite passada.
    • Sophia is the woman who/that my brother likes. - Sophia é a mulher que meu irmão gosta.
    • Isn’t that the famous singer who/that you listen every day? - Aquele não é o famoso cantor que você ouve todos os dias?

    Neste caso, quando o WHO e o THAT não é seguido imediatamente por um verbo, como vimos acima, esses pronomes relativos podem ser omitidos da frase. O que torna a sua fala no inglês ainda mais interessante e corriqueira. Shall we see some examples?

    • Luiz is the new roommate (who/that) Brian told was coming - Luiz is the new roommate Brian told was coming - Luiz é o novo colega de quarto que Brian disse que estava chegando).

    Hanna is an actress (who/that) I will never like - Hanna is an actress I will never like - Hanna é uma atriz que eu nunca vou gostar).

  • Gabarito (B)

    Who só pode ser utilizado quando o sujeito é uma pessoa, o which é utilizado quando o referente é uma coisa ou objeto. Já o that pode ser utilizado com os dois tipos de referentes (pessoas ou coisas/objetos).

    Guarde isso no seu coração.

    "I meet a woman that..."

    Repare que o pronome relativo "that" se refere a "woman" (mulher).

    Bons estudos!


ID
5155225
Banca
GS Assessoria e Concursos
Órgão
Prefeitura de Romelândia - SC
Ano
2020
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

The relative pronoun can be omitted in:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • O pronome relativo ''THAT'' pode ser omitido quando o próximo termo for um pronome ou um nome .

  • O pronome relativo pode ser o motivo quando estiver funcionando como objeto, ou seja, se após o pronome não vier um verbo.

    Caso venha um verbo posposto ele terá uma função de sujeito e portanto não poderá ser omitido.


ID
5183569
Banca
AMEOSC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Bandeirante - SC
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Analyze the paragraph below.


It was especially unusual to Helen, that remembered fondly the care and support they provided her mother after she was widowed.


The relative pronoun “that” can be replaced by.

Alternativas

ID
5206654
Banca
NUCEPE
Órgão
Prefeitura de Timon - MA
Ano
2020
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Answers the question according to the text below.

TEXT VI

Why are animals important to human beings?

There are a number of reasons why animals are important to human beings. The main reason is that animals benefit us personally, socially and economically.

Since the time of our cavemen ancestors, there have been interactions between humans and animals. Animals can be our friends, companions, protectors, benefactors and comforters. Research studies indicate that people who own pets and have close bond with them have higher self-esteem. They are also generally happier and healthier. There are many reported cases in which pets protected their owners and family members. In the United States, a pet dog alerted its owners that their babysitter was abusive. A couple who hired a babysitter to take care of their baby noticed that their pet dog was aggressive to the babysitter. Upon investigation, they discovered that their child was abused by the babysitter.

Animals provide many other benefits to humans. Insulin, a hormone in our body which controls the amount of sugar absorbed by our blood, could not be artificially produced previously. It had to be derived from cows and pigs. Nowadays, even though animal insulin has largely been replaced by artificial human insulin, the former is still available on prescription. Trained guide dogs are available to serve as loyal companions and ‘pairs of eyes’ for the blind. In the past, hunters took along hunting dogs to track, sniff out and catch wild game. When night fell, the canines were the hunters’ companions and protectors. In rehabilitation centers, animals are used to help the sick recover. For instance, petting a pony helps to lift a sick child’s spirit.

Throughout history, animals have helped humans. We use animals to work for us. In the agricultural sector, oxen pull ploughs before seeds are planted in the soil. We use horses for transportation purposes. They pull carriages and covered wagons for us. Even though oxen and horses are rarely used for farming and travelling purposes respectively today, the horses are still being used for riding and racing. They are also used to participate in contests in order to win awards. Farmers depend on animals such as cattle, poultry, sheep, goats, among others, for their horses are rarely used for farming and travelling purposes respectively today, the horses are still being used for riding and racing. They sell the animals’ meat, milk and eggs to earn money. In the fishing industry, although the use of modern equipment and technology have replaced the use of animals to catch fish, fishermen in some parts of the world still use animals like dolphins, otters and cormorants for the purpose.

Another indirectly way in which animals help us is that they assist in the reproduction of a variety of fruit and vegetable crops, which are an important part of our healthy diet. Without animals to help disperse seeds and pollinate plants, many of them would have become extinct.

In conclusion, animals are important to human beings because they benefit us socially, personally as well as economically. Since they are of great benefit to us, we should treat them well.

https://english312.com/why-are-animals-important-to-human-beings.html 

The words: WHO (line 08); EVEN THOUGH (line 13); LIKE (line 30), and AS WELL AS (line 37) are respectively:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • As well as economically / Bem como economicamente.

    BEM COMO ECONOMICAMENTE O QUE!!!!!!!!

    Isso é uma subordinating conjunction, e não coordinating conjunction.

  • LIKE como preposição :

    Na função de preposiçãoLIKE tem o mesmo significado que similar to. Ou seja, ela é usada para dizer que algo ou alguém é parecido com outro algo ou alguém.

    Nesse caso, em português, traduzimos por “igualzinho a”, “com”:

    • She’s like her mother. (Ela é igualzinha à mãe.)
    • You don’t look like your father. (Você não se parece com seu pai.)


ID
5250082
Banca
AMEOSC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Princesa - SC
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Analyze the sentence below:
I - (…) until she finds a friend who sings back;
II - Scattered ruins and a little cemetery are all which remain of their time;
III - I thought wooden boards were something that left the planet in the '60s.
Observing the use of the relative pronouns, choose the correct option:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Na assertiva II deveria ser where para se referir a lugar.

    Onde: Ruínas e pequeno cemitério.


ID
5250556
Banca
AMEOSC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Guarujá do Sul - SC
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Observer the sentence below.

“It reminded she which happened the last time they battled each other.”

Identify the option that corrects the underlined item.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • She é usado antes do verbo ao qual se refere.

    Her é usado depois do verbo ao qual se refere.


ID
5250571
Banca
AMEOSC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Guarujá do Sul - SC
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Analyze the fragment below.
“Graphene was famously discovered in 2004 by scientists in England who used adhesive tape to peel single layers.”
In the context above, the relative clause is adding information related to:

Alternativas

ID
5296678
Banca
AMAUC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Itá - SC
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Complete each sentence using where/whom/whose/who and choose the right answer below:


I - She doesn´t know the name of the girl to.........I saw Monday night.

II - A library is a place.......... children read a lot.

III - A teacher is a professional.......... teach and learn all the time.

IV - A mother is a person.......... enjoy the life with the children.

V - The place........we studied everyday was really marvelous.

Alternativas

ID
5296753
Banca
AMAUC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Ipumirim - SC
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

The sentences below need to be completed with where/whom/whose/who. Choose the right answer:


I - He doesn´t know the age of the girl to.........he saw saturday night.

II - A church is a place.......... people pray a lot.

III - A doctor is a person .......... care the health of people.

IV - A father is a man.......... play the children a lot.

V - The school........I studied was really fantastic.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • He doesn´t know the age of the girl to.........he saw saturday night.

    Ele viu a garota. O pronome relativo vai ser utilizado para fazer referência ao objeto direto do verbo "ver" que está no passado simples. Portanto, devemos utilizar "whom", uma vez que não se trata do sujeito, mas do objeto.

    A church is a place.......... people pray a lot.

    Where é o pronome relativo inglês utilizado para fazer referência a lugares. De maneira direta, equivale ao "onde" em português. Portanto, a igreja (church) é o local/lugar ONDE pessoas rezam/oram bastante.

    A doctor is a person .......... care the health of people.

    Note: o médico é a pessoa ________ care (cuida/trata) da saúde das pessoas. Ora, quem cuida? O médico. Quem é o sujeito que pratica a ação de cuidar? O médico. Então, devemos utilizar o pronome "who"

    A father is a man.......... play the children a lot.

    Utilizei a interpretação. É como se a afirmativa abordasse que o pai é o homem cuja característica é brincar bastante com as crianças no jardim. Meio subjetiva, mas é o que temos.

     The school........I studied was really fantastic.

    Mais uma vez, o pronome relativo vai trazer um local, ou seja, devemos utilizar o "where"

    C)

    EsPCEx 2022


ID
5296864
Banca
AMAUC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Seara - SC
Ano
2019
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Complete each sentence using where/whom/whose/who and choose the right answer below:


I - He doesn´t know the name of the dog to.........Ispoke yesterday night.

II - A house is a place.......people live togheter.

III - A humorista is a person.......believes that all the people are happy.

IV - An elephant is an animal........children are also very big.

V - The place........we spent our days was really wonderful.

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Explicação da questão:

    I - He doesn´t know the name of the dog to WHOM I spoke yesterday night. (Próximo a preposições utiliza-se o Whom)

    II - A house is a place Where people live togheter. (A palavra "Together" está escrita errada - O certo é Together). Where está sendo usada para Lugar. Tradução: Uma casa é um lugar ONDE pessoas vivem juntas.

    III - A humorista is a person Who believes that all the people are happy. (Who é usado para pessoas. Geralmente é utilizada próxima de verbos. (A palavra Humorista está escrita errada também, o certo é Humorist ou Comedian.

    IV - An elephant is an animal Whose children are also very big. Apesar de estar sendo falado sobre o "Elefante", o foco do contexto é "Children = Crianças/Filhos". Tradução: Um elefante é um animal CUJOS filhos também são muito grandes.

    V - The place Where we spent our days was really wonderful. The Place = O lugar = Where (Onde). Tradução: O lugar ONDE nós passamos nossos dias era realmente maravilhoso.


ID
5323906
Banca
Prefeitura de Treviso - SC
Órgão
Prefeitura de Treviso - SC
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Select the CORRECT relative pronoun in the following sentences:

I. The man ___lives next door is a lawyer.
II. Did you read the book ___ we told you?
III. The movie contained many scenes ___ shocked the audience..
IV. The girl ___ brother is arrested doesn’t say anything about it.
V. Do you see the animal ___ is on the tree?

Alternatives:

Alternativas

ID
5349676
Banca
UEG
Órgão
UEG
Ano
2015
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão.

 

Migrant or Refugee? There Is a Difference, With Legal Implications

 

In the first half of this year alone, at least 137,000 men, women and children crossed the Mediterranean Sea to reach the shores of Europe, according to the United Nations. Thousands are traveling across the Balkans now. However, are they refugee or migrants? Does it make any difference? In search for these answers, let’s read the interview.

 

Q. Does it matter what you call them?

A. Yes. The terms “migrant” and “refugee” are sometimes used interchangeably, but there is a crucial legal difference between the two.

 

Q. Who is a refugee?

A. Briefly, a refugee is a person who has fled his or her country to escape war or persecution, and can prove it.

 

Q. What does the distinction mean for European countries?

A. Refugees are entitled to basic protections under the 1951 convention and other international agreements. Once in Europe, refugees can apply for political asylum or another protected status, sometimes temporary. By law, refugees cannot be sent back to countries where their lives would be in danger. “One of the most fundamental principles laid down in international law is that refugees should not be expelled or returned to situations where their life and freedom would be under threat,” the refugee agency said in a statement on Thursday.

 

Q. Who is a migrant?

A. Anyone moving from one country to another is considered a migrant unless he or she is specifically fleeing war or persecution. Migrants may be fleeing dire poverty, or may be well-off and merely seeking better opportunities, or may be migrating to join relatives who have gone before them. There is an emerging debate about whether migrants fleeing their homes because of the effects of climate change – the desertification of the Sahel region, for example, or the sinking of coastal islands in Bangladesh – ought to be reclassified as refugees.

 

Q. Are migrants treated differently from refugees?

A. Countries are free to deport migrants who arrive without legal papers, which they cannot do with refugees under the 1951 convention. So it is not surprising that many politicians in Europe prefer to refer to everyone fleeing to the continent as migrants.

 

Disponível em: <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/28/world/migrants-refugees-europe-syria.html?_r=0>.  Acesso em: 15 set. 2015.


Considerando os aspectos estruturais do texto, tem-se o seguinte:

Alternativas

ID
5353234
Banca
FEPESE
Órgão
ABEPRO
Ano
2018
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

A Brief and Simplified Description of Papermaking


The paper we use today is created from individual wood fibers that are first suspended in water and then pressed and dried into sheets. The process of converting the wood to a suspension of wood fibers in water is known as pulp making, while the manufacture of the dried and pressed sheets of paper is formally termed papermaking. The process of making paper has undergone a steady evolution, and larger and more sophisticated equipment and better technology continue to improve it.


The Wood yard and Wood rooms


The process at Androscogging began with receiving wood in the form of chips or of logs 4 or 8 feet in length. From 6 AM to 10 PM a steady stream of trucks and railroad cars were weighted and unloaded. About 40 percent were suplied by independents who were paid by weight their logs. The mill also received wood chips from lumber mills in the area. The chips and logs were stored in mammoth piles with separate piles for wood of different species (such as pine, spruce, hemlock).


When needed, logs were floated in flumes......(1).....the wood yard.....(2).....one of the mill’s three wood rooms. There, bark was rubbed......(3)........in long, ribbed debarking drums by tumbling the logs against one another. The logs then fell into a chipper;......(4)......seconds a large log was reduced to a pile of chips approximately 1 inch by 1 inch by 1/4 inch.


The chips were stored in silos. There were separate silos for softwoods (spruce, fir, hemlock, and pine) and hardwoods (maple, oak, beech, and birch). This separate and temporary storage of chips permitted the controlled mixing of chips into the precise recipe for the grade of paper being produced.


The wood chips were then sorted through large, flat vibrating screens. Oversized chips were rechipped, and ones that were too small were collected for burning in the power house. (The mill provided approximately 20 percent of all its own steam and electricity needs from burning waste. An additional 50 percent of total electricity needs was produced by harnessing the river for hydroelectric power.)


Once drawn from the silo into the digesters, there was no stopping the flow of chips into paper. 


Pulpmaking


The pulp made at Androscoggin was of two types: Kraft pulp (produced chemically) and ground wood pulp (produced mechanically). Kraft pulp was far more important to the high quality white papers produced at Androscoggin, accounting for 80 percent of all the pulp used. Kraft pulp makes strong paper. (Kraft is German for strength. A German invented the Kraft pulp process in 1884.) A paper’s strength generally comes from the overlap and binding of long fibers of softwood; only chemically was it initially possible to separate long wood fibers for suspension in water. Hardwood fibers are generally smaller and thinner and help smooth the paper and make it less porous.


The ground wood pulping process was simpler and less expensive than the Kraft process. It took high quality spruce and fir logs and pressed them continuously against a revolving stone that broke apart the wood’s fibers. The fibers, however, were smaller than those produced by the Kraft process and, although used to make newsprint, were useful at Androscoggin in providing “fill” for the coated publication gloss papers of machines 2 and 3, as will be described later.


(A)The chemical Kraft process worked by dissolving the lignin that bonds wood fibers together. (B) It did this in a tall pressure cooker, called a digester, by “cooking” the chips in a solution of caustic soda (NaOH) and sodium sulfide (Na2S), which was termed the “white liquor.” (C)The two digesters at Androscoggin were continuous digesters; chips and liquor went into the top, were cooked together as they slowly settled down to the bottom, and were drawn off the bottom after about three hours. (D) By this time, the white liquor had changed chemically to “black liquor’’; the digested chips were then separated from this black liquor. (E)


In what was known as the “cold blow” process, the hot, pressurized chips were gradually cooled and depressurized. A “cold liquor’’ (170°F) was introduced to the bottom of the digester and served both to cool and to transport the digested chips to a diffusion washer that washed and depressurized the chips. Because so much of the lignin bonding the fibers together had been removed, the wood fiber in the chips literally fell apart at this stage.


The black liquor from the digester entered a separate four-step recovery process. Over 95 percent of the black liquor could be reconstituted as white liquor, thereby saving on chemical costs and significantly lowering pollution. The four-step process involved (1) washing the black liquor from the cooked fiber to produce weak black liquor, (2) evaporating the weak black liquor to a thicker consistency, (3) combustion of this heavy black liquor with sodium sulfate (Na2SO4 ), and redissolving the smelt, yielding a “green liquor” (sodium carbonate + sodium sulfide), and (4) adding lime, which reacted with the green liquor to produce white liquor. The last step was known as causticization.


Meanwhile, the wood-fiber pulp was purged of impurities like bark and dirt by mechanical screening and by spinning the mixture in centrifugal cleaners. The pulp was then concentrated by removing water from it so that it could be stored and bleached more economically.


By this time, depending on the type of pulp being made, it had been between 3 1/2 and 5 hours since the chips had entered the pulp mill. 


All the Kraft pulp was then bleached. Bleaching took between 5 and 6 hours. It consisted of a three-step process in which (1) a mix of chlorine (Cl2 ) and chlorine dioxide (CIO2 ) was introduced to the pulp and the pulp was washed; (2) a patented mix of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), liquid oxygen, and hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) was then added to the pulp and the pulp was again washed; and (3) chlorine dioxide (ClO2 ) was introduced and the pulp washed a final time. The result was like fluffy cream of wheat. By this time the pulp was nearly ready to be made into paper.


From the bleachery, the stock of pulp was held for a short time in storage (a maximum of 16 hours) and then proceeded through a series of blending operations that permitted a string of additives (for example, filler clay, resins, brighteners, alum, dyes) to be mixed into the pulp according to the recipe for the paper grade being produced. Here, too, “broke” (paper wastes from the mill itself) was recycled into the pulp. The pulp was then once again cleaned and blended into an even consistency before moving to the papermaking machine itself.


It made a difference whether the broke was of coated or uncoated paper, and whether it was white or colored. White, uncoated paper could be recycled immediately. Colored, uncoated paper had to be rebleached. Coated papers, because of the clays in them, could not be reclaimed.



In the following sentence “About 40 percent were suplied by independents who were paid by weight their logs, the underlined word, can be replaced, without changing its meaning, by:

Alternativas
Comentários
  • Cadê a palavra sublinhada???

  • Quando o pronome relativo for antecedido por pessoa, "independents who were paid by.." e for sucedido por Verbo, "independents who were paid by", ele é um sujeito do verbo, logo, usamos os pronomes relativos WHO ou THAT

    About 40 percent were suplied by independents who\that were paid 


ID
5367907
Banca
FEPESE
Órgão
ABEPRO
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

Opportunity Cost


This phenomenon goes by the name of ‘opportunity cost,’ since by not investing in more equipment and a more rigid production flow, the company is forgoing the opportunity to earn increased profits. These costs are every bite as real as the payment of dollars out-of-pocket.


This notion _______ opportunity cost can be reinforced _________ a famous saying ______ Benjamin Franklin, no slouch himself _________ operations management. To make the point, however, we must make a brief excursion into logic. One truth of logic is the validity of the so-called contrapositive, which says simply that if the statement “If A, then B” is true, then it is also true that “If not B, then not A.” That is, of every time A occurs B follows, then we can be sure that if B does not occur, then A did not occur as well. Enough logic then, and back to Ben Franklin.


One of his Poor Richard sayings is that “A penny saved is a penny earned.” We have all recognized the truth of that since childhood, but I assert that by this saying Ben showed us he knows everything about opportunity cost. After all, what is the contrapositive of “A penny not earned is a penny not saved (i.e., a penny sent). All we are saying by this notion of opportunity cost is that “a penny not earned (an opportunity forgone) is a penny spent.” We shall often have occasion to consider opportunity costs, in analyzing and deciding various operations issues.


SCHMENNER, Roger W. Production/Operations Management. 5th Edition. Prentice-Hall, 1993.

The underlined word in ‘One truth of logic is the validity of the so-called contrapositive, which says simply that if the statement…’ can be correctly classified as a:

Alternativas

ID
5370568
Banca
FEPESE
Órgão
ABEPRO
Ano
2017
Provas
Disciplina
Inglês
Assuntos

The Operations Function


Although somewhat ‘invisible’ to the marketplace the operations function in a typical company accounts for well over half the employment and well over half the physical assets. That, in itself, makes the operations function important. In a company’s organization chart, operations often enjoys parity with the other major business functions: marketing, sales, product engineering, finance control (accounting), and human resources (personnel, labor relations). Sometimes, the operations function is organized as a single entity which stretches out across the entire company, but more often it is embedded in the district, typically product-defined divisions into which most major companies are organized.


In many service businesses, the operations function is typically more visible. Service businesses are often organized into many branches, often with geographic responsibilities – field offices, retail outlets. In such tiers of the organization, operations are paramount.


The operations function itself is, often divided 

.................two major groupings .................tasks:

line management and support services. Line management generally refers.................those managers directly concerned................the manufacture of the product or the delivery of the service. They are the ones who are typically close enough to the product or service that they can ‘touch’ it. Line management supervises the hourly, blue-collar workforce. In a manufacturing company, line management frequently extends to the stockroom (where material, parts, and semi-finished products – termed ‘work-in-process inventory – are stored), materials handling, the tool room, maintenance, the warehouse (where finished goods are stored), and distribution, as well as the so-called ‘factory floor’. In a service operation, what is considered line management can broaden considerably. Often, order-taking roles, in addition to orderfilling roles, are supervised by service line managers.


Support services for line management’s operations can be numerous. Within a manufacturing environment, support services carry titles such as quality control, production planning and scheduling, purchasing, inventory control, production control (which determines the status of jobs in the factory and what to do about jobs that may have fallen behind schedule), industrial engineering (which is work methods oriented), manufacturing engineering (which is hardware-oriented), on-going product engineering, and field service. In a service environment, some of the same roles are played but sometimes under vastly different names.


Thus, the managers for whom operational issues are central can hold a variety of titles. In manufacturing, the titles can range from vice-president – manufacturing, works manager, plant manager, and similar titles at the top of the hierarchy, through such titles as manufacturing or production manager, general superintendent, department manager, materials manager, director of quality control, and down to general foreman or foreman. Within service businesses, ‘operations manager’ is sometimes used but frequently the title is more general – business manager, branch manager, retail manager, and so on.


SCHMENNER, Roger W. Production/Operations Management. 5th Edition. Prentice-Hall, 1993.

The underlined words in paragraphs 4 and 5 in the article, can be correctly classified as:

Alternativas